Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24710747›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2014

Adherence to transition guidelines in European paediatric nephrology units.

Thomas A Forbes, Alan R Watson, Aleksandra Zurowska, Rukshana Shroff, Sevcan Bakkaloglu, Karel Vondrak, Michel Fischbach, Johan Van de Walle, Gema Ariceta, Alberto Edefonti and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cysteamine (Cystagon®) adherence in patients with cystinosis in Spain: successful in children and a challenge in adolescents and adults.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 12 countries.

Thomas A ForbesNottingham Children's Hospital, Children's Renal and Urology Unit, QMC Campus, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Alan R Watson
Aleksandra Zurowska
Rukshana Shroff
Sevcan Bakkaloglu
Karel Vondrak
Michel Fischbach
Johan Van de Walle
Gema Ariceta
Alberto Edefonti
Christoph Aufricht
Augustina Jankauskiene
Tuula Holta
Mesiha Ekim
Claus Peter Schmitt
Constantinos Stefanidis
European Paediatric Dialysis Working Group
Derbyshire Children's Hospital · GBFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITGhent University Hospital · BEGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital in Motol · CZUniversity of Helsinki · FIAnkara University · TRGerman Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology · DEPanagiotis & Aglaia Kyriakou Children's Hospital · GRVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing focus on the problems involved in the transition and transfer of young adult patients from paediatric to adult renal units. This situation was addressed by the 2011 International Pediatric Nephrology Association/International Society of Nephrology (IPNA/ISN) Consensus Statement on transition.

methodsWe performed a survey of transition practices of 15 paediatric nephrology units across Europe 2 years after publication of the consensus statement.

resultsTwo thirds of units were aware of the guidelines, and one third had integrated them into their transition practice. Forty-seven per cent of units transfer five or fewer patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 per year to a median of five adult centres, with higher numbers of CKD stages 2-4 patients. Seventy-three per cent of units were required by the hospital or government to transfer patients by a certain age. Eighty per cent of units commenced transition planning after the patient turned 15 years of age and usually within 1-2 years of the compulsory transfer age. Forty-seven per cent of units used a transition or transfer clinic. Prominent barriers to effective transition were patient and parent attachment to the paediatric unit and difficulty in allowing the young person to perform self-care.

conclusionsWhereas awareness of the consensus statement is suboptimal, it has had some impact on practice. Adult nephrologists receive transferred patients infrequently, and the process of transition is introduced too late by paediatricians. Government- and hospital-driven age-based transfer policies distract focus from the achievement of competencies in self care. Variable use of transition clinics, written patient information and support groups is probably due to economic and human-resource limitations. The consensus statement provides a standard for evolving and evaluating transition policies jointly agreed upon by paediatric and adult units.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildEuropeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHospital UnitsHumansMaleNephrologyPatient TransferPediatricsPractice Guidelines as TopicYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24710747
OpenAlexW2027425616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.