Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24710518›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014

Landscape of standing variation for tandem duplications in Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila simulans.

Rebekah L Rogers, Julie M Cridland, Ling Shao, Tina T Hu, Peter Andolfatto, Kevin R Thornton

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Retention of a singlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Sex-biased duplicates are rapidly generated duringbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Dinucleotide preferences underlie apparent codon preference reversals in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. IntroUNET: identifying introgressed alleles via semantic segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Copy Number Variation of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebekah L RogersDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine rogersrl@uci.edu.
Julie M CridlandDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, IrvineDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Davis.
Ling ShaoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine.
Tina T HuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the Lewis Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University.
Peter AndolfattoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the Lewis Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University.
Kevin R ThorntonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine.

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Christine Hui · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Adaptive evolution of non coding DNA and gene expression divergence in DrosophilaR01GM083228 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDOLFATTO, PETER · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Population genetics of gene duplications and copy-number variants in the DrosophiR01GM085183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THORNTON, KEVIN R. · 2009 to 2013
$1.2M
Population genomics of polygenic adaptationR01GM115564 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THORNTON, KEVIN R. · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
Evolutionary Impacts of Chromosomal Rearrangements in DrosophilaF32GM099377 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ROGERS, REBEKAH LEE · 2011 to 2013
$148k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCI NIH HHS P30CA062203NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM099377NIGMS NIH HHS F32-GM099377NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083228NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM083228NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085183NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM085183NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have used whole genome paired-end Illumina sequence data to identify tandem duplications in 20 isofemale lines of Drosophila yakuba and 20 isofemale lines of D. simulans and performed genome wide validation with PacBio long molecule sequencing. We identify 1,415 tandem duplications that are segregating in D. yakuba as well as 975 duplications in D. simulans, indicating greater variation in D. yakuba. Additionally, we observe high rates of secondary deletions at duplicated sites, with 8% of duplicated sites in D. simulans and 17% of sites in D. yakuba modified with deletions. These secondary deletions are consistent with the action of the large loop mismatch repair system acting to remove polymorphic tandem duplication, resulting in rapid dynamics of gain and loss in duplicated alleles and a richer substrate of genetic novelty than has been previously reported. Most duplications are present in only single strains, suggesting that deleterious impacts are common. Drosophila simulans shows larger numbers of whole gene duplications in comparison to larger proportions of gene fragments in D. yakuba. Drosophila simulans displays an excess of high-frequency variants on the X chromosome, consistent with adaptive evolution through duplications on the D. simulans X or demographic forces driving duplicates to high frequency. We identify 78 chimeric genes in D. yakuba and 38 chimeric genes in D. simulans, as well as 143 cases of recruited noncoding sequence in D. yakuba and 96 in D. simulans, in agreement with rates of chimeric gene origination in D. melanogaster. Together, these results suggest that tandem duplications often result in complex variation beyond whole gene duplications that offers a rich substrate of standing variation that is likely to contribute both to detrimental phenotypes and disease, as well as to adaptive evolutionary change.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationTandem Repeat SequencesAnimalsDrosophilaEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenetic VariationGenomeGenotypeMutation RateSequence DeletiondeletionsDrosophila simulansDrosophila yakubaevolutionary noveltytandem duplications

Identifiers

PMID24710518
PMCPMC4069613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.