Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24710506›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2014

Assessing bolus retention in achalasia using high-resolution manometry with impedance: a comparator study with timed barium esophagram.

Yu K Cho, Anna M Lipowska, Frédéric Nicodème, Ezra N Teitelbaum, Eric S Hungness, Elyse R Johnston, Andrew Gawron, Peter J Kahrilas, John E Pandolfino

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06883175 (Evolution of the Chicago Classification), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06883175 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evolution of the Chicago Classification: Bridging Physiology and Mechanics

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2024 to 2029Enrolled575ConditionsDysphagia, Achalasia, Esophageal, Ineffective Esophageal MotilityArmsFLIP, HRM, Prucalopride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dysphagia: Novel and Emerging Diagnostic Modalities.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. New Developments in Esophageal Motility Testing.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Advances in Management of Esophageal Motility Disorders.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Achalasia: It Is Not All Black and White.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yu K ChoSeoul St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Anna M LipowskaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Frédéric Nicodème1] Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA [2] Department of Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qubec, Canada.
Ezra N TeitelbaumDepartment of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Eric S HungnessDepartment of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Elyse R JohnstonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andrew GawronDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Peter J KahrilasDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
John E PandolfinoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

THE ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION IN HEALTH AND DISEASER01DK056033 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KAHRILAS, PETER JAMES · 2001 to 2015
$4.1M
The mechanics of symptom generation in dysphagiaR01DK079902 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PANDOLFINO, JOHN E · 2009 to 2017
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056033NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079902NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK56033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess whether high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) could be used to assess bolus retention similar to the timed barium esophagram (TBE).

methodsTwenty achalasia patients (10 males, aged 21-79 years) were prospectively evaluated with HRIM and TBE to determine the correlation between barium column height and the impedance bolus height (IBH). The TBE protocol used a 200-ml barium challenge and the HRIM protocol used a 200-ml saline challenge protocol. Both protocols were performed in an upright position and the heights of the barium and impedance columns were measured at 1 and 5 min. Analysis of IBH was performed with a topographic technique and a spatial impedance variation plot.

resultsThere was no significant difference between the median IBH and barium column at 1 min (IBH: 12.0 cm (interquartile range (IQR), 8.0-18.0); TBE: 12.0 cm (IQR, 7.0-19.0); P=0.90) or at 5 min (IBH: 11.0 cm (IQR, 1.0-17.0); TBE: 9.0 cm (IQR, 4.0-12.0); P=0.47). In addition, the correlation between the two measurements at 1 and 5 min was 0.60 and 0.86, respectively. Using a barium column or impedance height of >5.0 as a definition of bolus retention was associated with 75% concordance at 1 min and 95% concordance at 5 min.

conclusionsThere was excellent agreement between TBE and high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) for assessing bolus retention at 5 min. Thus, HRM with impedance may be used as a single test to assess bolus retention and motor function in the management of achalasia.

Indexed as

Barium SulfateDiagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemElectric ImpedanceAdultAgedEsophageal AchalasiaEsophagusFemaleGastrointestinal TransitHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiographyYoung AdultBarium Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID24710506
PMCPMC4307753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.