Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24710117›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Suppression of cytokine release by fluticasone furoate vs. mometasone furoate in human nasal tissue ex-vivo.

Nan Zhang, Koen Van Crombruggen, Gabriele Holtappels, Feng Lan, Michail Katotomichelakis, Luo Zhang, Petra Högger, Claus Bachert

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The complex pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis: scientific rationale for the development of an alternative treatment option.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Nan ZhangUpper Airway Research Laboratory, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Koen Van CrombruggenUpper Airway Research Laboratory, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Gabriele HoltappelsUpper Airway Research Laboratory, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Feng LanUpper Airway Research Laboratory, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Michail KatotomichelakisDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Luo ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R.China.
Petra HöggerInstitute for Pharmacy and Food Chemistry, Julius-Maximilians-Universitity, Würzburg, Germany.
Claus BachertUpper Airway Research Laboratory, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Division of ENT Diseases, Clintec, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ghent University Hospital · BEBeijing Tongren Hospital · CNDemocritus University of Thrace · GRKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopical glucocorticosteroids are the first line therapy for airway inflammation. Modern compounds with higher efficacy have been developed, but head-to-head comparison studies are sparse.

objectiveTo compare the activity of two intranasal glucocorticoids, fluticasone furoate (FF) and mometasone furoate (MF) with respect to the inhibition of T helper (Th)1, Th2 and Th17 cytokine release in airway mucosa.

methodsWe used an ex-vivo human nasal mucosal tissue model and employed pre- and post- Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B (SEB)-challenge incubations with various time intervals and drug concentrations to mimic typical clinical situations of preventive or therapeutic use.

resultsAt a fixed concentration of 10-10 M, FF had significantly higher suppressive effects on interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-17 release, but not IL-5 or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, vs. MF. While the maximal suppressive activity was maintained when FF was added before or after tissue stimulation, the cytokine suppression capacity of MF appeared to be compromised when SEB-induced cell activation preceded the addition of the drug. In a pre-challenge incubation setting with removal of excess drug concentrations, MF approached inhibition of IL-5 and TNF-α after 6 and 24 hours while FF maximally blocked the release of these cytokines right after pre-incubation. Furthermore, FF suppressed a wider range of T helper cytokines compared to MF.

conclusionThe study demonstrates the potential of our human mucosal model and shows marked differences in the ability to suppress the release of various cytokines in pre- and post-challenge settings between FF and MF mimicking typical clinical situations of preventive or therapeutic use.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAndrostadienesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCytokinesEnterotoxinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMometasone FuroateNasal MucosaPregnadienediolsTime FactorsT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerAndrostadienesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCytokinesenterotoxin B, staphylococcalEnterotoxinsfluticasone furoateMometasone FuroatePregnadienediols

Identifiers

PMID24710117
PMCPMC3977874
OpenAlexW1991197008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.