Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24709985›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics2014

Epigenetic disorders and altered gene expression after use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in domestic cattle.

Rodrigo Urrego, Nélida Rodriguez-Osorio, Heiner Niemann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Epigenetic Reprogramming and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rodrigo UrregoGrupo CENTAURO; Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia; Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia; Grupo INCA-CES; Universidad CES; Medellín, Colombia.
Nélida Rodriguez-OsorioGrupo CENTAURO; Universidad de Antioquia; Medellín, Colombia.
Heiner NiemannInstitute of Farm Animal Genetics; Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI); Mariensee, Germany.
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEFundação de Estudo e Pesquisa em Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia · BRUniversidad de Antioquia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) in modern cattle breeding is an important tool for improving the production of dairy and beef cattle. A frequently employed ART in the cattle industry is in vitro production of embryos. However, bovine in vitro produced embryos differ greatly from their in vivo produced counterparts in many facets, including developmental competence. The lower developmental capacity of these embryos could be due to the stress to which the gametes and/or embryos are exposed during in vitro embryo production, specifically ovarian hormonal stimulation, follicular aspiration, oocyte in vitro maturation in hormone supplemented medium, sperm handling, gamete cryopreservation, and culture of embryos. The negative effects of some ARTs on embryo development could, at least partially, be explained by disruption of the physiological epigenetic profile of the gametes and/or embryos. Here, we review the current literature with regard to the putative link between ARTs used in bovine reproduction and epigenetic disorders and changes in the expression profile of embryonic genes. Information on the relationship between reproductive biotechnologies and epigenetic disorders and aberrant gene expression in bovine embryos is limited and novel approaches are needed to explore ways in which ARTs can be improved to avoid epigenetic disorders.

Indexed as

CattleEpigenesis, GeneticGene ExpressionAnimalsCattle DiseasesEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryonic DevelopmentHumansMaleNuclear Transfer TechniquesOocytesReproductive Techniques, AssistedSpecimen HandlingSpermatozoaSuperovulationDNA methylationembryo culturegenome imprintingin vitro maturationsuperovulation

Identifiers

PMID24709985
PMCPMC4065177
OpenAlexW2001129558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.