Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24709753›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2014

Comparative primate genomics: emerging patterns of genome content and dynamics.

Jeffrey Rogers, Richard A Gibbs

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 314 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey RogersHuman Genome Sequencing Center and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Richard A GibbsHuman Genome Sequencing Center and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Baylor Genetics · US

Funding

Large Scale Sequencing Variation in Rhesue Macaques - HIV Vaccine SupplementR24OD011173 · OD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ROGERS, JEFFREY A. · 2012 to 2017
$3.7M
Large-Scale Discovery of Functional Genetic Variation in Rhesus MacaquesR24RR032329 · NCRR · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ROGERS, JEFFREY A. · 2011 to 2011
$549k
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR032329NHGRI NIH HHS U54‑HG006484NIH HHS R24 OD011173NIH HHS R24‑OD011173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in genome sequencing technologies have created new opportunities for comparative primate genomics. Genome assemblies have been published for various primate species, and analyses of several others are underway. Whole-genome assemblies for the great apes provide remarkable new information about the evolutionary origins of the human genome and the processes involved. Genomic data for macaques and other non-human primates offer valuable insights into genetic similarities and differences among species that are used as models for disease-related research. This Review summarizes current knowledge regarding primate genome content and dynamics, and proposes a series of goals for the near future.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsBase SequenceGenetic SpeciationGenetic VariationGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansPrimates

Identifiers

PMID24709753
PMCPMC4113315
OpenAlexW1989216393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.