Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24709690›Full record

SynthesisThe pharmacogenomics journal2014

The effect of the UGT1A1*28 allele on survival after irinotecan-based chemotherapy: a collaborative meta-analysis.

M M Dias, J-P Pignon, C S Karapetis, V Boige, B Glimelius, D M Kweekel, P N Lara, P Laurent-Puig, E Martinez-Balibrea, D Páez and 6 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Allele frequency of genetic variations related to theJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2024
    Article
  6. Impact ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. UGT1A1 polymorphisms in cancer: impact on irinotecan treatment.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

M M DiasSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J-P PignonMeta-analysis Unit, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
C S KarapetisFlinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
V BoigeDepartment of Oncologic Medicine, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
B GlimeliusSection of Oncology, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
D M KweekelDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P N LaraDavis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA.
P Laurent-PuigUnité Mixte de Recherche S775, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
E Martinez-BalibreaLaboratori Biologia Molecular del Càncer, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Fundació Institut IGTP, Badalona, Spain.
D PáezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
C J A PuntDepartment of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M W RedmanLung and Cancer Control Committees, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Statistical Center: SWOG, Seattle, WA, USA.
G ToffoliExperimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, CRO-National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy.
M WadeliusDepartment of Medical Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
R A McKinnonFlinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
M J Sorich1] School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia [2] Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders University · AUInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRUppsala University · SECentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHospital de Sant Pau · ESInserm · FRInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESLeiden University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, studies of irinotecan pharmacogenetics have mostly focused on the effect of the UGT1A1*28 allele on irinotecan-related toxicity. However, the clinical utility of routine UGT1A1*28 genotyping to pre-emptively adjust irinotecan dosage is dependent upon whether UGT1A1*28 also affects patient survival following irinotecan therapy. Previous observational studies evaluating the influence of UGT1A1*28 on survival have shown contradictory results. A systematic review and meta-analysis of both published and unpublished data were performed to summarize the available evidence of the relationship between the UGT1A1*28 allele and patient survival related to irinotecan therapy. Overall and progression-free survival meta-analysis data were available for 1524 patients and 1494 patients, respectively. The difference in the survival between patients of different UGT1A1*28 genotypes (homozygous, heterozygous or wild-type) who had received irinotecan was not found to be statistically significant. There was also no evidence of irinotecan dose, regimen or line of therapy having an impact on this association.

Indexed as

AllelesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinDisease ProgressionGenotypeGlucuronosyltransferaseHumansIrinotecanNeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisUGT1A1 EnzymeCamptothecinGlucuronosyltransferaseIrinotecanUGT1A1 Enzyme

Identifiers

PMID24709690
OpenAlexW1991875253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.