Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24709587›Full record

ReviewVaccine2014

How advances in immunology provide insight into improving vaccine efficacy.

Mark K Slifka, Ian Amanna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How does geographical diversity shape vaccine efficacy?Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark K SlifkaDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Sciences University, 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA. Electronic address: slifkam@ohsu.edu.
Ian AmannaNajít Technologies, Inc., 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
YR 50 PROJ- ROBERTS PRIMATE ISLETP51RR000163 · NCRR · OREGON REGIONAL PRIMATE RESEARCH CENTER · PI FRUH, KLAUS J · 1985 to 2011
$140.8M
Development of an H2O2-Inactivated Dengue Virus VaccineR01AI098723 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SLIFKA, MARK K · 2012 to 2016
$7.3M
Development of a Yellow Fever Vaccine for Vulnerable PopulationR44AI079898 · NIAID · NAJIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · PI AMANNA, IAN JAMES, SLIFKA, MARK K · 2011 to 2020
$6.2M
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000163NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI098723NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI079898NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines represent one of the most compelling examples of how biomedical research has improved society by saving lives and dramatically reducing the burden of infectious disease. Despite the importance of vaccinology, we are still in the early stages of understanding how the best vaccines work and how we can achieve better protective efficacy through improved vaccine design. Most successful vaccines have been developed empirically, but recent advances in immunology are beginning to shed new light on the mechanisms of vaccine-mediated protection and development of long-term immunity. Although natural infection will often elicit lifelong immunity, almost all current vaccines require booster vaccination in order to achieve durable protective humoral immune responses, regardless of whether the vaccine is based on infection with replicating live-attenuated vaccine strains of the specific pathogen or whether they are derived from immunization with inactivated, non-replicating vaccines or subunit vaccines. The form of the vaccine antigen (e.g., soluble or particulate/aggregate) appears to play an important role in determining immunogenicity and the interactions between dendritic cells, B cells and T cells in the germinal center are likely to dictate the magnitude and duration of protective immunity. By learning how to optimize these interactions, we may be able to elicit more effective and long-lived immunity with fewer vaccinations.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAllergy and ImmunologyAnimalsBiomedical ResearchHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralImmunization, SecondaryImmunologic MemoryT-LymphocytesVaccinationVaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccinesAntibodyImmunological memoryProtectionVaccination

Identifiers

PMID24709587
PMCPMC4096845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.