ArticleAnaerobe2014
The role of the humoral immune response to Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in susceptibility to C. difficile infection: a case-control study.
Article in Anaerobe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extraintestinal Manifestations ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Immunization Strategies Against Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Blastocystis and Clostridioides difficile: Evidence for a Synergistic Role in Colonization Among IBD Patients with Emphasis on Ulcerative Colitis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Enhanced Humoral Immune Responses against Toxin A and B ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Bezlotoxumab for Preventing Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Narrative Review from Pathophysiology to Clinical Studies.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2020Review
- From Nursery to Nursing Home: Emerging Concepts in Clostridioides difficile Pathogenesis.Infection and immunity · 2020Review
- A human gut ecosystem protects against C. difficile disease by targeting TcdA.Journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- High prevalence of subclass-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies againstClinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Current infectious disease reports · 2016Review
- Clostridium difficile Toxins A and B: Insights into Pathogenic Properties and Extraintestinal Effects.Toxins · 2016Review
- Gastrointestinal dysbiosis and the use of fecal microbial transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody levels to Clostridium difficile toxin A (TcdA), but not toxin B (TcdB), have been found to determine risk of C. difficile infection (CDI). Historically, TcdA was thought to be the key virulence factor; however the importance of TcdB in disease is now established. We re-evaluated the role of antibodies to TcdA and TcdB in determining patient susceptibility to CDI in two separate patient cohorts. In contrast to earlier studies, we find that CDI patients have lower pre-existing IgA titres to TcdB, but not TcdA, when compared to control patients. Our findings suggest that mucosal immunity to TcdB may be important in the early stages of infection and identifies a possible target for preventing CDI progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.