Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708919›Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2014

A phase II trial of intraperitoneal EGEN-001, an IL-12 plasmid formulated with PEG-PEI-cholesterol lipopolymer in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Ronald D Alvarez, Michael W Sill, Susan A Davidson, Carolyn Y Muller, David P Bender, Robert L DeBernardo, Kian Behbakht, Warner K Huh

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Interleukin-12 as an in situ cancer vaccine component: a review.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Tumor Microenvironment in Ovarian Cancer: Function and Therapeutic Strategy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Polymeric vehicles for nucleic acid delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald D AlvarezDept. of OB/GYN, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35233-7333, USA. Electronic address: rdalvarez@uab.edu.
Michael W SillGynecologic Oncology Group Statistical & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Susan A DavidsonDept. of OB/GYN, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Carolyn Y MullerDept. of OB/GYN, University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
David P BenderDept. of OB/GYN, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Robert L DeBernardoDept. of Gynecologic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Kian BehbakhtDept. of OB/GYN, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Warner K HuhDept. of OB/GYN, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35233-7333, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USCleveland Clinic · USGynecologic Oncology Group · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Quynh-Thu Xuan Le, ROBERT S. MANNEL · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA101165 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 2003 to 2014
$43.1M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareUG1CA233180 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Harold John Burstein · 2019 to 2026
$8.6M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareU10CA180867 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD JOHN, KIBEL, ADAM S · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
NCTN Deep South Research ConsortiumU10CA180855 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BJORNSTI, MARY-ANN, FALKSON, CARLA I · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Phase 2 of EGEN-001 for Tx of Chemotherapy-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian CancerR01FD003942 · FDA · EXPRESSION GENETICS, INC. · PI ANWER, KHURSHEED · 2011 to 2013
$928k
FDA HHS R01 FD003942FDA HHS R01FD003942-01NCI NIH HHS CA 27469NCI NIH HHS CA 37517NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA101165NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the toxicity and antitumor activity of EGEN-001 in platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

methodsEligible patients had weekly IP infusion of EGEN-001 at a dose of 24mg/m(2). Toxicity and antitumor activity were evaluated using CTCAE and RESIST criteria, respectively. Co-primary endpoints were tumor response and survival without progression (PFS) for at least 6months. Survival without progression before going onto a subsequent therapy (EFS) for at least six months was also considered.

resultsA total of 58 EGEN-001 cycles were administered to 20/22 enrolled patients (median 2cycles, range 1-9). The most frequently associated adverse events related specifically to EGEN-001 treatment were grade 1/2 fatigue, fever, chills, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. Three of 20 EGEN-001 treated patients evaluable for toxicity elected to withdraw from the study motivated in part by grade 1 treatment related toxicities. There were no patients with partial or complete response (0%; 90% CI 0-10.9%). Seven (35%) of 16 patients evaluable for response had stable disease, and 9 (45%) had progressive disease. Six (30%) patients had a PFS of greater than six months, although three had gone off study and onto other therapies before six months. The estimated six-month EFS was 15%. The median PFS and OS were 2.89 and 9.17months, respectively.

conclusionEGEN-001 at the dose and schedule evaluated was associated with some but limited activity and was seemingly less tolerated in platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedCarcinoma, EndometrioidCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCholesterolCystadenocarcinoma, SerousDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesHumansInfusions, ParenteralInterleukin-12CholesterolInterleukin-12poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(ethyleneimine)Polyethylene GlycolsPolyethyleneimineGene therapyOvarian cancerPhase II trial

Identifiers

PMID24708919
PMCPMC4057915
OpenAlexW1995272148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.