Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708909›Full record

ArticleSurgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery

Revisional bariatric surgery is more effective for improving obesity-related co-morbidities than it is for reinducing major weight loss.

Daniel McKenna, Don Selzer, Michael Burchett, Jennifer Choi, Samer G Mattar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT06287307. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06287307 phase4not yet recruiting

Semaglutide 2.4mg for Low Responders After Bariatric Surgery

Ran2024Enrolled152Registered outcomes55Posted comparisons0ConditionsObesity, Obesity, Morbid, Weight GainArmsPlacebo, Semaglutide 2.4 MG/0.75 ML Subcutaneous Solution [WEGOVY]
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical significance of failure to lose weight 10 years after roux-en-y gastric bypass.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel McKennaDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. Electronic address: dmckenna@iupui.edu.
Don SelzerDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Michael BurchettDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Jennifer ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Samer G MattarDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients having previous bariatric surgery are at risk for weight regain and return of co-morbidities. If an anatomic basis for the failure is identified, many surgeons advocate revision or conversion to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The aim of this study was to determine whether revisional bariatric surgery leads to sufficient weight loss and co-morbidity remission. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom 2005-2012, patients undergoing revision were entered into a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative outcomes, including complications, weight loss, and co-morbidity remission, were examined for all patients with a history of a previous vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

resultsTwenty-two patients with a history of RYGB and 56 with a history of VBG were identified. Following the revisional procedure, the RYGB group experienced 35.8% excess weight loss (%EWL) and a 31.8% morbidity rate. For the VBG group, patients experienced a 46.2% %EWL from their weight before the revisional operation with a 51.8% morbidity rate. Co-morbidity remission rate was excellent. Diabetes (VBG:100%, RYGB: 85.7%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (VBG: 94.4%, RYGB: 80%), and hypertension (VBG: 74.2%, RYGB:60%) demonstrated significant improvement.

conclusionRevision of a failed RYGB or conversion of a VBG to a RYGB provides less weight loss and a higher complication rate than primary RYGB but provides an excellent opportunity for co-morbidity remission.

Indexed as

AdultBody Mass IndexFemaleGastric BypassGastroesophageal RefluxGastroplastyHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidReoperationRetrospective StudiesSleep Apnea, ObstructiveTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryCo-morbidity remissionRevisionWeight regain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.