Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708889›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2014

Manual and automated methods for identifying potentially preventable readmissions: a comparison in a large healthcare system.

Ana H Jackson, Emily Fireman, Paul Feigenbaum, Estee Neuwirth, Patricia Kipnis, Jim Bellows

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02621723 (Capturing Readmission Internationally to Prevent Readmission by Safer@Home), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02621723 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Capturing Readmission Internationally to Prevent Readmission by Safer@Home

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAmsterdam UMC, location VUmcRan2016 to 2018Enrolled1,000ConditionsHospital Readmission
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana H JacksonCare Management Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA. ana.h.jackson@kp.org.
Emily Fireman
Paul Feigenbaum
Estee Neuwirth
Patricia Kipnis
Jim Bellows

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of potentially preventable readmissions is typically accomplished through manual review or automated classification. Little is known about the concordance of these methods.

methodsWe manually reviewed 459 30-day, all-cause readmissions at 18 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals, determining potential preventability through a four-step manual review process that included a chart review tool, interviews with patients, their families, and treating providers, and nurse reviewer and physician evaluation of findings and determination of preventability on a five-point scale. We reassessed the same readmissions with 3 M's Potentially Preventable Readmission (PPR) software. We examined between-method agreement and the specificity and sensitivity of the PPR software using manual review as the reference.

resultsAutomated classification and manual review respectively identified 78% (358) and 47% (227) of readmissions as potentially preventable. Overall, the methods agreed about the preventability of 56% (258) of readmissions. Using manual review as the reference, the sensitivity of PPR was 85% and specificity was 28%.

conclusionsConcordance between methods was not high enough to replace manual review with automated classification as the primary method of identifying preventable 30-day, all-cause readmission for quality improvement purposes.

Indexed as

AgedCaliforniaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHospital Information SystemsHumansMalePatient ReadmissionQualitative ResearchQuality Assurance, Health CareSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24708889
PMCPMC3984394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.