ArticleBMC systems biology2014
Classification of transient behaviours in a time-dependent toggle switch model.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-dependent bistability leads to critical slowing down during floral transition in Arabidopsis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Towards a mathematical framework for modelling cell fate dynamics.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Dynamical systems of fate and form in development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025Review
- From genes to patterns: five key dynamical systems concepts to decode developmental regulatory mechanisms.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- Tuning Ultrasensitivity in Genetic Logic Gates Using Antisense RNA Feedback.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Dynamic processes of fate decision in inducible bistable systems.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Approximated gene expression trajectories for gene regulatory network inference on cell tracks.iScience · 2024Article
- Tipping points in epithelial-mesenchymal lineages from single-cell transcriptomics data.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- A mathematical framework for measuring and tuning tempo in developmental gene regulatory networks.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Dynamics behind Glioblastoma Multiforme Single-Cell Data Heterogeneity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Non-asymptotic transients away from steady states determine cellular responsiveness to dynamic spatial-temporal signals.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Single-cell multi-omics and lineage tracing to dissect cell fate decision-making.Stem cell reports · 2023Review
- spliceJAC: transition genes and state-specific gene regulation from single-cell transcriptome data.Molecular systems biology · 2022Article
- In preprints: the problem of producing precise patterns.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022Article
- Context-Dependent Stability and Robustness of Genetic Toggle Switches with Leaky Promoters.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Homology of process: developmental dynamics in comparative biology.Interface focus · 2021Article
- Time and space in segmentation.Interface focus · 2021Article
- Quantifying cell transitions in C. elegans with data-fitted landscape models.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWaddington's epigenetic landscape is an intuitive metaphor for the developmental and evolutionary potential of biological regulatory processes. It emphasises time-dependence and transient behaviour. Nowadays, we can derive this landscape by modelling a specific regulatory network as a dynamical system and calculating its so-called potential surface. In this sense, potential surfaces are the mathematical equivalent of the Waddingtonian landscape metaphor. In order to fully capture the time-dependent (non-autonomous) transient behaviour of biological processes, we must be able to characterise potential landscapes and how they change over time. However, currently available mathematical tools focus on the asymptotic (steady-state) behaviour of autonomous dynamical systems, which restricts how biological systems are studied.
resultsWe present a pragmatic first step towards a methodology for dealing with transient behaviours in non-autonomous systems. We propose a classification scheme for different kinds of such dynamics based on the simulation of a simple genetic toggle-switch model with time-variable parameters. For this low-dimensional system, we can calculate and explicitly visualise numerical approximations to the potential landscape. Focussing on transient dynamics in non-autonomous systems reveals a range of interesting and biologically relevant behaviours that would be missed in steady-state analyses of autonomous systems. Our simulation-based approach allows us to identify four qualitatively different kinds of dynamics: transitions, pursuits, and two kinds of captures. We describe these in detail, and illustrate the usefulness of our classification scheme by providing a number of examples that demonstrate how it can be employed to gain specific mechanistic insights into the dynamics of gene regulation.
conclusionsThe practical aim of our proposed classification scheme is to make the analysis of explicitly time-dependent transient behaviour tractable, and to encourage the wider use of non-autonomous models in systems biology. Our method is applicable to a large class of biological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.