Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708834›Full record

ReviewBMC psychiatry2014

Clozapine: a review of clinical practice guidelines and prescribing trends.

Stephanie Warnez, Silvia Alessi-Severini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02640300 (Switching Antipsychotics), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02640300 phase4completednot on this map

Switching Antipsychotics: Abrupt Discontinuation Versus Overlap

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthRan1999 to 2004Enrolled33ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizoaffective DisorderArmsClozapine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guidelines for the Pharmacotherapy of Schizophrenia in Adults.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie Warnez
Silvia Alessi-SeveriniFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. Silvia.Alessi-Severini@umanitoba.ca.
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClozapine effectiveness in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia has been sustained by published evidence in the last two decades, despite the introduction of safer options. DISCUSSION: Current clinical practice guidelines have strongly recommended the use of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but prescribing trends do not appear to have followed such recommendations. Clozapine is still underutilized especially in patients at risk of suicide. It seems that physicians are hesitant in prescribing clozapine due to concerns about serious adverse effects. Recent reports have highlighted the need to inform health professionals about the benefits of treating patients with clozapine and have voiced concerns about the underutilization of clozapine especially in patients at risk of suicide. SUMMARY: Guidelines and prescribing patterns reported in various countries worldwide are discussed. Suggestions on how to optimize clozapine utilization have been published but more efforts are needed to properly inform and support prescribers' practices.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsClozapineDrug PrescriptionsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'SchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsClozapine

Identifiers

PMID24708834
PMCPMC3999500
OpenAlexW2084250773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.