Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708787›Full record

ArticleEvoDevo2014

Analysis of the Wnt gene repertoire in an onychophoran provides new insights into the evolution of segmentation.

Mattias Hogvall, Anna Schönauer, Graham E Budd, Alistair P McGregor, Nico Posnien, Ralf Janssen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EvoDevo, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Extensive loss of Wnt genes in Tardigrada.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Embryonic expression of priapulid Wnt genes.Development genes and evolution · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. EvoDevo · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Delta-Notch signalling in segmentation.Arthropod structure & development · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mattias Hogvall
Anna Schönauer
Graham E Budd
Alistair P McGregor
Nico Posnien
Ralf JanssenDepartment of Earth Sciences, Palaeobiology, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, Uppsala, 75236, Sweden. ralf.janssen@geo.uu.se.
Uppsala University · SEOxford Brookes University · GBUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Onychophora are a probable sister group to Arthropoda, one of the most intensively studied animal phyla from a developmental perspective. Pioneering work on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and subsequent investigation of other arthropods has revealed important roles for Wnt genes during many developmental processes in these animals.

resultsWe screened the embryonic transcriptome of the onychophoran Euperipatoides kanangrensis and found that at least 11 Wnt genes are expressed during embryogenesis. These genes represent 11 of the 13 known subfamilies of Wnt genes.

conclusionsMany onychophoran Wnt genes are expressed in segment polarity gene-like patterns, suggesting a general role for these ligands during segment regionalization, as has been described in arthropods. During early stages of development, Wnt2, Wnt4, and Wnt5 are expressed in broad multiple segment-wide domains that are reminiscent of arthropod gap and Hox gene expression patterns, which suggests an early instructive role for Wnt genes during E. kanangrensis segmentation.

Identifiers

PMID24708787
PMCPMC4021614
OpenAlexW2114716472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.