Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708735›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2014

A double blind randomized controlled trial in neonates to determine the effect of vitamin A supplementation on immune responses: The Gambia protocol.

Suzanna L R McDonald, Mathilde Savy, Anthony J C Fulford, Lindsay Kendall, Katie L Flanagan, Andrew M Prentice

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01476358 (A Randomized Controlled Trial in Human Neonates to Determine the Effect of Vitamin A Supplementation on Immune Responses), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01476358 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial in Human Neonates to Determine the Effect of Vitamin A Supplementation on Immune Responses

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2011Enrolled200ConditionsVitamin A DeficiencyArmsVitamin A (retinyl palmitate).
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Heterologous and sex differential effects of administering vitamin A supplementation with vaccines.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Suzanna L R McDonaldMedical Research Council (MRC) International Nutrition Group (ING), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom & MRC Keneba, London, The Gambia. Suzanna.McDonald@lshtm.ac.uk.
Mathilde Savy
Anthony J C Fulford
Lindsay Kendall
Katie L Flanagan
Andrew M Prentice
MRC Unit the Gambia · GMMedical Research Council · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC-A760-5QX00Medical Research Council MC_U123292701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin A supplementation significantly reduces all-cause mortality when given between 6-59 months of age, but has a null or detrimental effect when given between 1-5 months. Studies of neonatal vitamin A supplementation conducted across Africa and South Asia have produced conflicting findings. These age-pattern variations might result from immunological interactions between vitamin A supplementation and vaccines. Knowledge on the potential immunological sequelae of human neonatal vitamin A supplementation is so scarce that the foremost aim of this study is to seek indicative data on aspects of immunity likely to be affected by neonatal vitamin A supplementation. The objective of this trial is to test whether human neonatal vitamin A supplementation modulates immune function including improved thymic maturation in infancy and improved systemic immune responses to routine immunization. METHODS/

designIn an area of moderate vitamin A deficiency in a peri-urban area of The Gambia, 200 mother-infant pairs were enrolled in a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Within 48 hours of birth, neonates were randomised with stratification by birth weight and sex to receive either an oral dose of 50,000 IU vitamin A or placebo. Expanded Programme of Immunisation birth vaccinations were administered after supplementation, with subsequent vaccinations administered at 8, 12 and 16 weeks of age. A range of immunological outcomes were examined up to 17 weeks of age, with additional morbidity and anthropometry follow-up carried out throughout the first year of life. The primary endpoint of this trial is the frequency of circulating T regulatory (Treg) cells expressing gut homing receptors in infants at 17 week post-supplementation, with secondary outcomes including thymus maturation and B cell immune responses. DISCUSSION: Indicative immunological data from this trial (and its Bangladeshi counterpart), will complement the larger randomised controlled trials (conducted in India, Tanzania and Ghana), on the effectiveness and safety of neonatal vitamin A supplementation in improving infant survival. Combined these trials, in addition to the existing trials, will inform policy.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT01476358.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAntioxidantsB-LymphocytesDiterpenesDouble-Blind MethodFlow CytometryGambiaHepatitis B AntibodiesHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantInfant, NewbornIntestinesReceptors, Lymphocyte HomingRetinyl EstersThymus GlandAntioxidantsDiterpenesHepatitis B AntibodiesReceptors, Lymphocyte Homingretinol palmitateRetinyl EstersVitamin A

Identifiers

PMID24708735
PMCPMC4018469
OpenAlexW2135613410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.