Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708642›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2014

Development of a new occupational balance-questionnaire: incorporating the perspectives of patients and healthy people in the design of a self-reported occupational balance outcome instrument.

Mona Dür, Günter Steiner, Veronika Fialka-Moser, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Clemens Dejaco, Birgit Prodinger, Michaela Alexandra Stoffer, Alexa Binder, Josef Smolen, Tanja Alexandra Stamm

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04784819 (Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Occupational Balance-Questionnaire), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04784819 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Occupational Balance-Questionnaire (OB-Quest) in Turkish

TypeobservationalSponsorUskudar UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled339ConditionsOccupational Balance, Occupational Therapy, Survey, Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of an occupation-based sleep programme for people with Insomnia.Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mona Dür
Günter Steiner
Veronika Fialka-Moser
Alexandra Kautzky-Willer
Clemens Dejaco
Birgit Prodinger
Michaela Alexandra Stoffer
Alexa Binder
Josef Smolen
Tanja Alexandra StammDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria. tanja.stamm@meduniwen.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-reported outcome instruments in health research have become increasingly important over the last decades. Occupational therapy interventions often focus on occupational balance. However, instruments to measure occupational balance are scarce. The aim of the study was therefore to develop a generic self-reported outcome instrument to assess occupational balance based on the experiences of patients and healthy people including an examination of its psychometric properties.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative analysis of the life stories of 90 people with and without chronic autoimmune diseases to identify components of occupational balance. Based on these components, the Occupational Balance-Questionnaire (OB-Quest) was developed. Construct validity and internal consistency of the OB-Quest were examined in quantitative data. We used Rasch analyses to determine overall fit of the items to the Rasch model, person separation index and potential differential item functioning. Dimensionality testing was conducted by the use of t-tests and Cronbach's alpha.

resultsThe following components emerged from the qualitative analyses: challenging and relaxing activities, activities with acknowledgement by the individual and by the sociocultural context, impact of health condition on activities, involvement in stressful activities and fewer stressing activities, rest and sleep, variety of activities, adaptation of activities according to changed living conditions and activities intended to care for oneself and for others. Based on these, the seven items of the questionnaire (OB-Quest) were developed. 251 people (132 with rheumatoid arthritis, 43 with systematic lupus erythematous and 76 healthy) filled in the OB-Quest. Dimensionality testing indicated multidimensionality of the questionnaire (t = 0.58, and 1.66 after item reduction, non-significant). The item on the component rest and sleep showed differential item functioning (health condition and age). Person separation index was 0.51. Cronbach's alpha changed from 0.38 to 0.57 after deleting two items.

conclusionsThis questionnaire includes new items addressing components of occupational balance meaningful to patients and healthy people which have not been measured so far. The reduction of two items of the OB-Quest showed improved internal consistency. The multidimensionality of the questionnaire indicates the need for a summary of several components into subscales.

Indexed as

AdultArthritis, RheumatoidAutoimmune DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1EmploymentFemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRelaxationReproducibility of ResultsScleroderma, SystemicSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24708642
PMCPMC4005851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.