Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708641›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2014

Equity in use of maternal health services in Western Rural China: a survey from Shaanxi province.

Yuan Shen, Hong Yan, Klemetti Reija, Qiang Li, Shengbin Xiao, Jianmin Gao, Zhongliang Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhibitors and facilitators to the utilization of postpartum care in China: an integrative review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Structural Determinants of Child Health in Rural China: The Challenge of Creating Health Equity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuan Shen
Hong YanDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, P,R, China. yanh_paper@163.com.
Klemetti Reija
Qiang Li
Shengbin Xiao
Jianmin Gao
Zhongliang Zhou
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 20th century was marked by a significant improvement in worldwide human health and access to healthcare. However, these improvements were not completely or uniformly distributed among, or even within, nations. This study was designed to assess the use of maternal health services by pregnant women in China, with a focus on the inequity related to family income level.

methodsTwo population-based cross-sectional surveys were carried out in the Zhenan and Lantian counties in March 2007 and from December 2008 to March 2009. A total of 2562 women completed the questionnaires, including 948 who were pregnant in 2006 and 1614 from 2008-2009. The concentration index (CI) was calculated and used to analyze the parameters of maternal health care in the two counties surveyed.

resultsThe responses in both 2006 and 2008-2009 indicated a bias towards higher (rich) economic statuses for the use of maternal and child health services. The CI of 'delivery at health facility' was 0.0206 (95% confidence interval between 0.0114 and 0.0299) for 2006 and 0.0053 (95% confidence interval between 0.0015 and 0.0091) for 2008, which represented a statistically significant inequity for women of lower (poor) economic statuses. Similar CI was observed in 'receiving antenatal care within 12 weeks' for 2006 (CI2006 = 0.0956, 95% confidence interval between 0.0516 and 0.1396). The CIs of 'postnatal visit' and 'postnatal visit >3-times' was positive (except for 2006), indicating that the poor used postnatal care less than the non-poor. In 2008, poor women had C-sections more often than non-poor women (CI2008 = -0.0629, 95% confidence interval between-0.1165 and -0.0093), but such a difference was not observed in 2006.

conclusionsIn 2006 and 2008, the use of maternal health services in western rural China was significantly unequal between pregnant women of poor and non-poor economic statuses. Financial support that enables poorer pregnant women to use health services will be beneficial. Utilization of maternal healthcare services can be improved if out-of-pocket expenses can be minimized.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedPregnancyRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24708641
PMCPMC3985545
OpenAlexW2048091360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.