Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708411›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2014

Grass-specific CD4(+) T-cells exhibit varying degrees of cross-reactivity, implications for allergen-specific immunotherapy.

L D Archila, J H DeLong, E Wambre, E A James, D M Robinson, W W Kwok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ana o 1 and Ana o 2 cashew allergens share cross-reactive CD4(+) T cell epitopes with other tree nuts.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2016
    Article
  9. Jug r 2-reactive CD4(+) T cells have a dominant immune role in walnut allergy.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2015
    Article
  10. Immunological consequences of intragenus conservation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis T-cell epitopes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Practical recommendations for mixing allergy immunotherapy extracts.Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.) · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L D ArchilaBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, USA.
J H DeLong
E Wambre
E A James
D M Robinson
W W Kwok

Funding

Investigation of T cell responses to immunotherapy using class II tetramersR01AI095074 · NIAID · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI DURHAM, STEPHEN REGINALD, KWOK, WILLIAM W. · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS 5 R01 AI095074NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200700046CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConceptually, allergic responses may involve cross-reactivity by antibodies or T-cells. While IgE cross-reactivity among grass-pollen allergens has been observed, cross-reactivity at the allergen-specific T-cell level has been less documented. Identification of the patterns of cross-reactivity may improve our understanding, allowing optimization of better immunotherapy strategies.

objectivesWe use Phleum pratense as model for the studying of cross-reactivity at the allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell level among DR04:01 restricted Pooideae grass-pollen T-cell epitopes.

methodsAfter in vitro culture of blood mono-nucleated cells from grass-pollen-allergic subjects with specific Pooideae antigenic epitopes, dual tetramer staining with APC-labelled DR04:01/Phleum pratense tetramers and PE-labelled DR04:01/Pooideae grass homolog tetramers was assessed to identify cross-reactivity among allergen-specific DR04:01-restricted T-cells in six subjects. Direct ex vivo staining enabled the comparison of frequency and phenotype of different Pooideae grass-pollen reactive T-cells. Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays were also used to examine phenotypes of these T-cells.

resultsT-cells with various degrees of cross-reactive profiles could be detected. Poa p 1 97-116 , Lol p 1 221-240 , Lol p 5a 199-218 , and Poa p 5a 199-218 were identified as minimally cross-reactive T-cell epitopes that do not show cross-reactivity to Phl p 1 and Phl p 5a epitopes. Ex vivo tetramer staining assays demonstrated T-cells that recognized these minimally cross-reactive T-cell epitopes are present in Grass-pollen-allergic subjects.

conclusionsOur results suggest that not all Pooideae grass epitopes with sequence homology are cross-reactive. Non-cross-reactive T-cells with comparable frequency, phenotype and functionality to Phl p-specific T-cells suggest that a multiple allergen system should be considered for immunotherapy instead of a mono-allergen system.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicAllelesAllergensAmino Acid SequenceAntigens, PlantBasophilsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCross ReactionsCytokinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA AntigensHumansImmunoglobulin ELymphocyte ActivationPeptidesPoaceaeAllergensAntigens, PlantCytokinesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA AntigensImmunoglobulin EPeptidesallergyCD4+cross-reactivityepitopesgrass-pollenMHC class II tetramersPooideaeT-cells

Identifiers

PMID24708411
PMCPMC4069242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.