Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708363›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Mycobacterium leprae genomes from a British medieval leprosy hospital: towards understanding an ancient epidemic.

Tom A Mendum, Verena J Schuenemann, Simon Roffey, G Michael Taylor, Huihai Wu, Pushpendra Singh, Katie Tucker, Jason Hinds, Stewart T Cole, Andrzej M Kierzek and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Stone AgeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. One Health Approaches to TraceFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Multi-omic detection ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Genomic Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tom A MendumDepartment of Microbial and Cellular Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH Guildford, UK. t.mendum@surrey.ac.uk.
Verena J Schuenemann
Simon Roffey
G Michael Taylor
Huihai Wu
Pushpendra Singh
Katie Tucker
Jason Hinds
Stewart T Cole
Andrzej M Kierzek
Kay Nieselt
Johannes Krause
Graham R Stewart
University of Surrey · GBÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Winchester · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy has afflicted humankind throughout history leaving evidence in both early texts and the archaeological record. In Britain, leprosy was widespread throughout the Middle Ages until its gradual and unexplained decline between the 14th and 16th centuries. The nature of this ancient endemic leprosy and its relationship to modern strains is only partly understood. Modern leprosy strains are currently divided into 5 phylogenetic groups, types 0 to 4, each with strong geographical links. Until recently, European strains, both ancient and modern, were thought to be exclusively type 3 strains. However, evidence for type 2 strains, a group normally associated with Central Asia and the Middle East, has recently been found in archaeological samples in Scandinavia and from two skeletons from the medieval leprosy hospital (or leprosarium) of St Mary Magdalen, near Winchester, England.

resultsHere we report the genotypic analysis and whole genome sequencing of two further ancient M. leprae genomes extracted from the remains of two individuals, Sk14 and Sk27, that were excavated from 10th-12th century burials at the leprosarium of St Mary Magdalen. DNA was extracted from the surfaces of bones showing osteological signs of leprosy. Known M. leprae polymorphisms were PCR amplified and Sanger sequenced, while draft genomes were generated by enriching for M. leprae DNA, and Illumina sequencing. SNP-typing and phylogenetic analysis of the draft genomes placed both of these ancient strains in the conserved type 2 group, with very few novel SNPs compared to other ancient or modern strains.

conclusionsThe genomes of the two newly sequenced M. leprae strains group firmly with other type 2F strains. Moreover, the M. leprae strain most closely related to one of the strains, Sk14, in the worldwide phylogeny is a contemporaneous ancient St Magdalen skeleton, vividly illustrating the epidemic and clonal nature of leprosy at this site. The prevalence of these type 2 strains indicates that type 2F strains, in contrast to later European and associated North American type 3 isolates, may have been the co-dominant or even the predominant genotype at this location during the 11th century.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialArchaeologyBone and BonesEpidemicsEvolution, MolecularGenotypeHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, MedievalHumansLeprosyMycobacterium lepraeOsteologyPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID24708363
PMCPMC4234520
OpenAlexW2147861350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.