Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24708081›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2014

Correspondence between psychometric and clinical high risk for psychosis in an undergraduate population.

David C Cicero, Elizabeth A Martin, Theresa M Becker, Anna R Docherty, John G Kerns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Persistence of psychosis spectrum symptoms in the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: a prospective two-year follow-up.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Schizotypy from a developmental perspective.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David C CiceroDepartment of Psychology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Elizabeth A MartinMental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System.
Theresa M BeckerInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington.
Anna R DochertyDepartment of Statistical Genetics, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University.
John G KernsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.

Funding

Research Training: Psychiatric &Statistical GeneticsT32MH020030 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HERMINE H MAES, MICHAEL CHURTON NEALE · 1999 to 2026
$6.7M
Alcohol and Adult Development: Understanding Etiology and ConsequencesK05AA017242 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI SHER, KENNETH JAMES · 2007 to 2016
$2.1M
Understanding Delusions: Aberrant Salience and Defensive Self-ProcessingF31MH086190 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CICERO, DAVID COLIN · 2009 to 2010
$55k
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA017242NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH086190NIMH NIH HHS MH086190NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the common use of either psychometric or clinical methods for identifying individuals at risk for psychosis, previous research has not examined the correspondence and extent of convergence of these 2 approaches. Undergraduates (n = 160), selected from a larger pool, completed 3 self-report schizotypy scales: the Magical Ideation Scale, the Perceptual Aberration Scale, and the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale. They were administered the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. First, high correlations were observed for self-report and interview-rated psychotic-like experiences (rs between .48 and .61, p < .001). Second, 77% of individuals who identified as having a risk for psychosis with the self-report measures reported at least 1 clinically meaningful psychotic-like experience on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. Third, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that the self-report scales can be used to identify which participants report clinically meaningful positive symptoms. These results suggest that mostly White undergraduate participants who identify as at risk with the psychometric schizotypy approach report clinically meaningful psychotic-like experiences in an interview format and that the schizotypy scales are moderately to strongly correlated with interview-rated psychotic-like experiences. The results of the current research provide a baseline for comparing research between these 2 approaches.

Indexed as

Prodromal SymptomsSchizophrenic PsychologyAdolescentFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsPsychotic DisordersReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentROC CurveSchizophreniaSchizotypal Personality DisorderYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24708081
PMCPMC4152399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.