Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24707348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers of biogeography2013

An horizon scan of biogeography.

Michael N Dawson, Adam C Algar, Alexandre Antonelli, Liliana M Dávalos, Edward Davis, Regan Early, Antoine Guisan, Roland Jansson, Jean-Philippe Lessard, Katharine A Marske and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers of biogeography, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael N Dawson *School of Natural Sciences, 5200 North Lake Road, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
Adam C Algar *School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD UK.
Alexandre Antonelli *Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Liliana M Dávalos *Ecology and Evolution, and Consortium for Inter Disciplinary Environmental Research, Stony Brook University, NY, USA.
Edward Davis *Department of Geological Sciences, Museum of Natural and Cultural History, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Regan Early *Cátedra Rui Nabeiro - Biodiversidade, Universidade de Évora, 7000-890 Évora, Portugal and Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Antoine Guisan *Department of Ecology and Evolution, and Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Roland Jansson *Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Jean-Philippe Lessard *Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, Department of Biology, McGill University, Canada.
Katharine A Marske *Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jenny L McGuire *School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Alycia L Stigall *Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, USA.
Nathan G Swenson *Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Niklaus E Zimmermann *Landscape Dynamics Unit, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Daniel G Gavin *Department of Geography, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

Funding

European Research Council 311024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The opportunity to reflect broadly on the accomplishments, prospects, and reach of a field may present itself relatively infrequently. Each biennial meeting of the International Biogeography Society showcases ideas solicited and developed largely during the preceding year, by individuals or teams from across the breadth of the discipline. Here, we highlight challenges, developments, and opportunities in biogeography from that biennial synthesis. We note the realized and potential impact of rapid data accumulation in several fields, a renaissance for inter-disciplinary research, the importance of recognizing the evolution-ecology continuum across spatial and temporal scales and at different taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional levels, and re-exploration of classical assumptions and hypotheses using new tools. However, advances are taxonomically and geographically biased, and key theoretical frameworks await tools to handle, or strategies to simplify, the biological complexity seen in empirical systems. Current threats to biodiversity require unprecedented integration of knowledge and development of predictive capacity that may enable biogeography to unite its descriptive and hypothetico-deductive branches and establish a greater role within and outside academia.

Indexed as

community assemblyecological geneticsfunctional diversitymulti-temporal explanationsphylogeneticsphylogeographyspecies distribution modelingsynthesis

Identifiers

PMID24707348
PMCPMC3972886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.