ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2014
Effects of exposure to normobaric hyperoxia on the recovery of local muscle fatigue in the quadriceps femoris of young people.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of normobaric hyperoxic recovery after exercise on subsequent performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis with secondary physiological outcomes.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Muscle oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy during resistance training: A scoping review.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Effects of intermittent hypoxia and hypoxia-hyperoxia exposure on recovery from delayed onset muscle soreness in physically active men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Effects of movement from a postural maintenance position on lumbar hemodynamic changes.Journal of physical therapy science · 2016Article
- Effects of muscle activity and number of resistance exercise repetitions on perceived exertion in tonic and phasic muscle of young Korean adults.Journal of physical therapy science · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Acute development of local muscle fatigue and recovery often become large issues on sports fields. This study aimed to identify the effects of normobaric hyperoxia on the recovery of local muscle fatigue. [Subjects] Eleven healthy males participated in this study, and they all completed two protocols in a random order. [Methods] Subjects performed single-leg isometric knee extension at 70% of their maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) for as long as possible. Each participant was subsequently treated with one of two recovery conditions: 20.9% O2 or 30.0% O2 for 30 minutes. Afterwards, they performed an identical isometric task to measure the extent of their recovery. The following parameters were used to assess the degrees of muscle fatigue: MVIC, endurance time, surface electromyography (sEMG) power spectra, and changes in hemoglobin concentration using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). [Results] The treatment of 30.0% O2 induced a significant recovery rate in MVIC compared to the 20.9% O2. Additionally, the data revealed a significantly higher concentration of total hemoglobin after the 30.0% O2 treatment than after the 20.9% O2 treatment. [Conclusion] The results of this study suggest that recovery from acute muscle fatigue can be better facilitated under 30.0% normobaric hyperoxia than a normoxic condition. Therefore, for cases requiring quicker full recovery, treatment under 30.0% O2 environment for 30 minutes is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.