ArticleJournal of medical genetics2014
A blinded international study on the reliability of genetic testing for GGGGCC-repeat expansions in C9orf72 reveals marked differences in results among 14 laboratories.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of pharmacogenetic interactions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials.Neurology · 2017Pooled it
- Pharmacogenetic interactions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a step closer to a cure?The pharmacogenomics journal · 2020Trial
- Repeat Variants, Biomarkers, and Molecular Signatures in Parkinson's Disease:International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Pathology of three ALS patients with FUS variants, including one likely benign Q23L variant lacking FUS inclusions.Human molecular genetics · 2025Article
- Modelling Population Genetic Screening in Rare Neurodegenerative Diseases.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Review
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caused by hexanucleotide repeat expansions in C9orf72: from genetics to therapeutics.The Lancet. Neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Poly-GA immunohistochemistry is a reliable tool for detecting C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- PABPC1 mediates degradation ofiScience · 2024Article
- LUSTR: a new customizable tool for calling genome-wide germline and somatic short tandem repeat variants.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Validated assays for the quantification of C9orf72 human pathology.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Distribution of theFrontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Differential Expression of miRNAs in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients.Molecular neurobiology · 2023Article
- Evidence-based consensus guidelines for ALS genetic testing and counseling.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023Article
- The C9ORF72 repeat expansion alters neurodevelopment.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Repeat length of C9orf72-associated glycine-alanine polypeptides affects their toxicity.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2023Article
- Familial Cerebellar Ataxia and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/Frontotemporal Dementia with DAB1 and C9ORF72 Repeat Expansions: An 18-Year Study.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022Article
- Expanding Clinical Spectrum ofNeurology. Genetics · 2022Review
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe GGGGCC-repeat expansion in C9orf72 is the most frequent mutation found in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Most of the studies on C9orf72 have relied on repeat-primed PCR (RP-PCR) methods for detection of the expansions. To investigate the inherent limitations of this technique, we compared methods and results of 14 laboratories.
methodsThe 14 laboratories genotyped DNA from 78 individuals (diagnosed with ALS or FTD) in a blinded fashion. Eleven laboratories used a combination of amplicon-length analysis and RP-PCR, whereas three laboratories used RP-PCR alone; Southern blotting techniques were used as a reference.
resultsUsing PCR-based techniques, 5 of the 14 laboratories got results in full accordance with the Southern blotting results. Only 50 of the 78 DNA samples got the same genotype result in all 14 laboratories. There was a high degree of false positive and false negative results, and at least one sample could not be genotyped at all in 9 of the 14 laboratories. The mean sensitivity of a combination of amplicon-length analysis and RP-PCR was 95.0% (73.9-100%), and the mean specificity was 98.0% (87.5-100%). Overall, a sensitivity and specificity of more than 95% was observed in only seven laboratories.
conclusionsBecause of the wide range seen in genotyping results, we recommend using a combination of amplicon-length analysis and RP-PCR as a minimum in a research setting. We propose that Southern blotting techniques should be the gold standard, and be made obligatory in a clinical diagnostic setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.