Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24706903›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Gene-expression analysis of hair cell regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

Linjia Jiang, Andres Romero-Carvajal, Jeff S Haug, Christopher W Seidel, Tatjana Piotrowski

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. eLife · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Mutation of the GDP-Fucose Biosynthesis GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. PeerJ · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Hair Cell Regeneration: From Animals to Humans.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linjia JiangStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110.
Andres Romero-Carvajal
Jeff S Haug
Christopher W Seidel
Tatjana Piotrowski
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Analysis of Hair Cell Regeneration in ZebrafishRC1DC010631 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PIOTROWSKI, TATJANA, SANCHEZ ALVARADO, ALEJANDRO · 2009 to 2010
$838k
NIDCD NIH HHS 1RC1DC010631NIDCD NIH HHS RC1 DC010631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deafness caused by the terminal loss of inner ear hair cells is one of the most common sensory diseases. However, nonmammalian animals (e.g., birds, amphibians, and fish) regenerate damaged hair cells. To understand better the reasons underpinning such disparities in regeneration among vertebrates, we set out to define at high resolution the changes in gene expression associated with the regeneration of hair cells in the zebrafish lateral line. We performed RNA-Seq analyses on regenerating support cells purified by FACS. The resulting expression data were subjected to pathway enrichment analyses, and the differentially expressed genes were validated in vivo via whole-mount in situ hybridizations. We discovered that cell cycle regulators are expressed hours before the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling following hair cell death. We propose that Wnt/β-catenin signaling is not involved in regulating the onset of proliferation but governs proliferation at later stages of regeneration. In addition, and in marked contrast to mammals, our data clearly indicate that the Notch pathway is significantly down-regulated shortly after injury, thus uncovering a key difference between the zebrafish and mammalian responses to hair cell injury. Taken together, our findings lay the foundation for identifying differences in signaling pathway regulation that could be exploited as potential therapeutic targets to promote either sensory epithelium or hair cell regeneration in mammals.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingRegenerationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically Modifiedbeta CateninFlow CytometryGenes, cdcHair Cells, AuditoryNeomycinOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReceptors, NotchSignal TransductionWnt ProteinsZebrafishbeta CateninNeomycinReceptors, NotchWnt Proteinscdkn1bJak/Stat3neuromastRNA sequencingsignaling pathway analysis

Identifiers

PMID24706903
PMCPMC3986165
OpenAlexW1971462103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.