Non-Neanderthal origin of the HLA-DPB1*0401.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. MaLAdapt Reveals Novel Targets of Adaptive Introgression From Neanderthals and Denisovans in Worldwide Human Populations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023
   Article
2. Elucidating the origin of HLA-B*73 allelic lineage: Did modern humans benefit by archaic introgression?Immunogenetics · 2017
   Article
3. Distribution of HLA haplotypes across Japanese Archipelago: similarity, difference and admixture.Journal of human genetics · 2015
   Review
4. Evidence for archaic adaptive introgression in humans.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015
   Review
5. Reply to Ding et al.: Non-Neanderthal origin of the HLA-DPB1*0401.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Reply to Ding et al.: Non-Neanderthal origin of the HLA-DPB1*0401.2014
• Comment on
  A novel family of human leukocyte antigen class II receptors may have its origin in archaic human species.2014

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as