Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24706161›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2014

Efficacy and safety of linezolid for the treatment of infections in children: a meta-analysis.

Maria Ioannidou, Fani Apostolidou-Kiouti, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Ioannis Niopas, Emmanuel Roilides

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Key Considerations in Evaluating Syphilis Therapeutics.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria IoannidouDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Aristotle University, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece, ioannidou_m@hotmail.com.
Fani Apostolidou-Kiouti
Anna-Bettina Haidich
Ioannis Niopas
Emmanuel Roilides
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRHippocration General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledLinezolid is an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent, with activity against Gram-positive bacteria. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linezolid in children with infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens. A systematic search was conducted by two independent reviewers to identify published studies up to September 2013. The accumulated relevant literature was subsequently systematically reviewed, and a meta-analysis was conducted. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in children versus other antimicrobial agents for infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. The primary outcome was treatment success in patients who received at least one dose of study drug, had clinical evidence of disease, and had complete follow-up. Meta-analysis was conducted with random effects models because of heterogeneity across the trials. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 815 patients, were included. Linezolid was slightly more effective than control antibiotic agents, but the difference was not statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) = 1.39, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.98]. Treatment with linezolid was not associated with more adverse effects in general (OR = 0.61, 95 % CI 0.25-1.48). Eradication efficiency did not differ between linezolid and control regimens, but the sample size for these comparisons was small.

conclusionThe use of linezolid cannot be steadily supported from the results of the current meta-analysis. It appears to be slightly more effective than control antibiotic agents, but the difference was not significant, and the serious limitations present in this study restrict its use. Further studies providing evidence for clinical and microbiological efficacy of linezolid will support its use.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnti-Infective AgentsChildGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansLinezolidOxazolidinonesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeAcetamidesAnti-Infective AgentsLinezolidOxazolidinones

Identifiers

PMID24706161
OpenAlexW2018672791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.