ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2014
Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: brains, bones and breeding.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The therapeutic potential of descending regulatory pathways from brain to bone in osteoporosis: focusing on the brain-bone axis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- The presence of migraine symptoms was associated with a higher likelihood to present eating disorders symptoms among teenage students.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2022Article
- Iowa Gambling Task and Distortion in Perception of Body Image Among Adolescent Women With Eating Disorders.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Medication in AN: A Multidisciplinary Overview of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Eating Disorders: An Evolutionary Psychoneuroimmunological Approach.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- ESCAP Expert Paper: New developments in the diagnosis and treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa--a European perspective.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2015Article
- RISK BEHAVIOR FOR BULIMIA AMONG ADOLESCENTS.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao PauloArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent research has modified both the conceptualization and treatment of eating disorders. New diagnostic criteria reducing the "not otherwise specified" category should facilitate the early recognition and treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). Technology-based studies identify AN and BN as "brain circuit" disorders; epidemiologic studies reveal that the narrow racial, ethnic and income profile of individuals no longer holds true for AN. The major organs affected long term-the brain and skeletal system-both respond to improved nutrition, with maintenance of body weight the best predictor of recovery. Twin studies have revealed gene x environment interactions, including both the external (social) and internal (pubertal) environments of boys and of girls. Family-based treatment has the best evidence base for effectiveness for younger patients. Medication plays a limited role in AN, but a major role in BN. Across diagnoses, the most important medicine is food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.