Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24705618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Effects of soil organic matter properties and microbial community composition on enzyme activities in cryoturbated arctic soils.

Jörg Schnecker, Birgit Wild, Florian Hofhansl, Ricardo J Eloy Alves, Jiří Bárta, Petr Capek, Lucia Fuchslueger, Norman Gentsch, Antje Gittel, Georg Guggenberger and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of biofertilizers from goat and sheep manure on rhizospheric microbial community of Cenchrus ciliaris.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Rotation of soybean andFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jörg SchneckerUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Birgit WildUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Florian HofhanslUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria.
Ricardo J Eloy AlvesAustrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria; University of Vienna, Department of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, Division of Archaea Biology and Ecogenomics, Vienna, Austria.
Jiří BártaUniversity of South Bohemia, Department of Ecosystems Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Petr CapekUniversity of South Bohemia, Department of Ecosystems Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Lucia FuchsluegerUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria.
Norman GentschLeibniz Universität Hannover, Institut für Bodenkunde, Hannover, Germany.
Antje GittelAustrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria; University of Bergen, Centre for Geobiology, Department of Biology, Bergen, Norway.
Georg GuggenbergerLeibniz Universität Hannover, Institut für Bodenkunde, Hannover, Germany.
Angelika HoferUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria.
Sandra KienzlUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria.
Anna KnoltschUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Nikolay LashchinskiyCentral Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Robert MikuttaLeibniz Universität Hannover, Institut für Bodenkunde, Hannover, Germany.
Hana SantrůčkováUniversity of South Bohemia, Department of Ecosystems Biology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Olga ShibistovaLeibniz Universität Hannover, Institut für Bodenkunde, Hannover, Germany; VN Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
Mounir TakritiUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Tim UrichAustrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria; University of Vienna, Department of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, Division of Archaea Biology and Ecogenomics, Vienna, Austria.
Georg WeltinInternational Atomic Energy Agency, Joint FAO/IAEA Division for Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Soil and Water Management & Crop Nutrition Laboratory, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas RichterUniversity of Vienna, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Polar Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme-mediated decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM) is controlled, amongst other factors, by organic matter properties and by the microbial decomposer community present. Since microbial community composition and SOM properties are often interrelated and both change with soil depth, the drivers of enzymatic decomposition are hard to dissect. We investigated soils from three regions in the Siberian Arctic, where carbon rich topsoil material has been incorporated into the subsoil (cryoturbation). We took advantage of this subduction to test if SOM properties shape microbial community composition, and to identify controls of both on enzyme activities. We found that microbial community composition (estimated by phospholipid fatty acid analysis), was similar in cryoturbated material and in surrounding subsoil, although carbon and nitrogen contents were similar in cryoturbated material and topsoils. This suggests that the microbial community in cryoturbated material was not well adapted to SOM properties. We also measured three potential enzyme activities (cellobiohydrolase, leucine-amino-peptidase and phenoloxidase) and used structural equation models (SEMs) to identify direct and indirect drivers of the three enzyme activities. The models included microbial community composition, carbon and nitrogen contents, clay content, water content, and pH. Models for regular horizons, excluding cryoturbated material, showed that all enzyme activities were mainly controlled by carbon or nitrogen. Microbial community composition had no effect. In contrast, models for cryoturbated material showed that enzyme activities were also related to microbial community composition. The additional control of microbial community composition could have restrained enzyme activities and furthermore decomposition in general. The functional decoupling of SOM properties and microbial community composition might thus be one of the reasons for low decomposition rates and the persistence of 400 Gt carbon stored in cryoturbated material.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyArctic RegionsCarbonEnzyme ActivationEnzymesGeographyHydrolysisNitrogenSiberiaSoilCarbonEnzymesNitrogenSoil

Identifiers

PMID24705618
PMCPMC3976392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.