Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24705615›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2014

Baseline adiponectin levels do not influence the response to pioglitazone in ACT NOW.

Devjit Tripathy, Stephen C Clement, Dawn C Schwenke, MaryAnn Banerji, George A Bray, Thomas A Buchanan, Amalia Gastaldelli, Robert R Henry, Abbas E Kitabchi, Sunder Mudaliar and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for Reversing Prediabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.American journal of preventive medicine · 2022 · on this map
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cardioprotective Effects of Pioglitazone in Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Devjit TripathyTexas Diabetes Institute and University of Texas Health Science Center and Audie L. Murphy Hospital, South Texas VA Health Care System, San Antonio, TX.
Stephen C ClementDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Dawn C SchwenkePhoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ.
MaryAnn BanerjiState University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NY.
George A BrayPennington Biomedical Research Center/Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Thomas A BuchananUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Amalia GastaldelliUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, and Cardiometabolic Risk Unit, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.
Robert R HenryVA San Diego Healthcare System and University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Abbas E KitabchiDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN.
Sunder MudaliarVA San Diego Healthcare System and University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Robert E RatnerMedstar Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD.
Frankie B StentzDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN.
Nicolas MusiTexas Diabetes Institute and University of Texas Health Science Center and Audie L. Murphy Hospital, South Texas VA Health Care System, San Antonio, TX.
Peter D ReavenPhoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ.
Ralph A DeFronzoTexas Diabetes Institute and University of Texas Health Science Center and Audie L. Murphy Hospital, South Texas VA Health Care System, San Antonio, TX albarado@uthscsa.edu.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USArizona State University · USAudie L. Murphy Memorial VA Hospital · USGeorgetown University · USMedStar Health · USPennington Biomedical Research Center · USPhoenix VA Health Care System · USState University of New York · USTexas Diabetes Institute · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Southern California · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000130 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2012 to 2015
$36.0M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR001120 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2013 to 2017
$16.5M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthKL2TR001118 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, DOUGHERTY, DONALD M · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001118NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000130NCATS NIH HHS UL1-TR-000130NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePlasma adiponectin levels are reduced in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and other insulin-resistant states. We examined whether plasma adiponectin levels at baseline and after pioglitazone treatment in impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) subjects were associated with improved insulin sensitivity (SI) and glucose tolerance status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA total of 602 high-risk IGT subjects in ACT NOW were randomized to receive pioglitazone or placebo with a median follow-up of 2.4 years.

resultsPioglitazone reduced IGT conversion to diabetes by 72% in association with improved β-cell function by 64% (insulin secretion/insulin resistance index) and increased tissue sensitivity by 88% (Matsuda index). In pioglitazone-treated subjects, plasma adiponectin concentration increased threefold from 13 ± 0.5 to 38 ± 2.5 μg/mL (P < 0.001) and was strongly correlated with the improvement in SI (r = 0.436, P < 0.001) and modestly correlated with glucose area under the curve during oral glucose tolerance test (r = 0.238, P < 0.005) and insulin secretion/insulin resistance index (r = 0.306, P < 0.005). The increase in adiponectin was a strong predictor of reversion to normal glucose tolerance and prevention of T2DM. In the placebo group, plasma adiponectin did not change and was not correlated with changes in glucose levels. There was an inverse association between baseline plasma adiponectin concentration and progression to diabetes in the placebo group but not in the pioglitazone group.

conclusionsBaseline adiponectin does not predict the response to pioglitazone. The increase in plasma adiponectin concentration after pioglitazone therapy in IGT subjects is strongly related to improved glucose tolerance status and enhanced tissue sensitivity to insulin.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAdiponectinBlood GlucoseCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucose IntoleranceGlucose Tolerance TestHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin-Secreting CellsMaleMiddle AgedAdiponectinBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinPioglitazoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID24705615
PMCPMC4179517
OpenAlexW2063119849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.