Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24705442›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2014

Effect of a cognitive aid on adherence to perioperative assessment and management guidelines for the cardiac evaluation of noncardiac surgical patients.

William R Hand, Kathryn H Bridges, Marjorie P Stiegler, Randall M Schell, Amy N DiLorenzo, Jesse M Ehrenfeld, Paul J Nietert, Matthew D McEvoy

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William R HandFrom the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine (W.R.H., K.H.B.) and Department of Public Health Sciences (P.J.N.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (M.P.S.); Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky (R.M.S., A.N.D.); Departments of Anesthesiology, Surgery, and Biomedical Informatics (J.M.F.) and Department of Anesthesiology (M.D.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kathryn H Bridges
Marjorie P Stiegler
Randall M Schell
Amy N DiLorenzo
Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Paul J Nietert
Matthew D McEvoy

Funding

SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000062NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR029882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2007 American College of Cardiologists/American Heart Association Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery is the standard for perioperative cardiac evaluation. Recent work has shown that residents and anesthesiologists do not apply these guidelines when tested. This research hypothesized that a decision support tool would improve adherence to this consensus guideline.

methodsAnesthesiology residents at four training programs participated in an unblinded, prospective, randomized, cross-over trial in which they completed two tests covering clinical scenarios. One quiz was completed from memory and one with the aid of an electronic decision support tool. Performance was evaluated by overall score (% correct), number of incorrect answers with possibly increased cost or risk of care, and the amount of time required to complete the quizzes both with and without the cognitive aid. The primary outcome was the proportion of correct responses attributable to the use of the decision support tool.

resultsAll anesthesiology residents at four institutions were recruited and 111 residents participated. Use of the decision support tool resulted in a 25% improvement in adherence to guidelines compared with memory alone (P < 0.0001), and participants made 77% fewer incorrect responses that would have resulted in increased costs. Use of the tool was associated with a 3.4-min increase in time to complete the test (P < 0.001).

conclusionsUse of an electronic decision support tool significantly improved adherence to the guidelines as compared with memory alone. The decision support tool also prevented inappropriate management steps possibly associated with increased healthcare costs.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyCognitionCross-Over StudiesDisease ManagementFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMalePractice Guidelines as TopicPreoperative CareProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24705442
PMCPMC4108481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.