Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24705328›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

PCR for the diagnosis of abdominal angiostrongyliasis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human tissue.

Rubens Rodriguez, Ana Cristina Aramburú da Silva, Carla Aristonara Müller, Silvana Lunardini Alves, Carlos Graeff-Teixeira, Fernando Fornari

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Insights into the genetic diversity ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rubens RodriguezPrograma de Pós-Graduação: Ciências em Gastroenterologia e Hepatologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo-RS, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Aramburú da SilvaLaboratórios de Biologia Parasitária e Parasitologia Molecular, Pontifíca Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil.
Carla Aristonara MüllerLaboratórios de Biologia Parasitária e Parasitologia Molecular, Pontifíca Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil.
Silvana Lunardini AlvesLaboratórios de Biologia Parasitária e Parasitologia Molecular, Pontifíca Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil.
Carlos Graeff-TeixeiraLaboratórios de Biologia Parasitária e Parasitologia Molecular, Pontifíca Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil.
Fernando FornariPrograma de Pós-Graduação: Ciências em Gastroenterologia e Hepatologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo-RS, Brazil.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade de Passo Fundo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date the diagnosis of abdominal angiostrongyliasis (AA) depends on the histological identification of Angiostrongylus costaricensis (AC) in surgical specimens. However, microscopic evaluation is time consuming and often fails in identifying the parasite. We tested whether PCR might help in the diagnosis of AA by identifying parasite DNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. We used primers based on DNA from Angiostrongilus cantonensis. Four groups of FFPE intestinal tissue were tested: (1) confirmed cases (n = 20), in which AC structures were present in the target tissue; (2) presumptive cases (n = 20), containing changes secondary to AC infection in the absence of AC structures; (3) negative controls (n = 3), consisting of normal colonic tissue; and (4) tissue affected by other parasitoses (n = 7), including strongyloidiasis, ascaridiasis, schistosomiasis, and enterobiasis. Most lesions of confirmed cases were located in small and/or large bowel (90%), as compared with presumptive cases, in which 70% of lesions were in appendix (P = 0.0002). When confronted with cases of other parasitoses, PCR showed sensitivity of 55%, specificity of 100% and positive predictive value of 100%. In presumptive cases PCR was positive in 4 (20%). All specimens from negative controls and other parasitoses were negative. In conclusion, the PCR technique showed intermediate sensitivity and optimal specificity, being clinically relevant when positive for abdominal angiostrongyliasis. It allowed a 20% gain in diagnosis of presumptive cases. PCR might help in the diagnosis of abdominal angiostrongyliasis, particularly when the pathologists are not experienced with such disease.

Indexed as

AngiostrongylusAnimalsDNA PrimersFormaldehydeHumansParaffin EmbeddingPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityStrongylida InfectionsTissue FixationDNA PrimersFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID24705328
PMCPMC3976301
OpenAlexW2046978788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.