Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24705319›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The influence of social structure, habitat, and host traits on the transmission of Escherichia coli in wild elephants.

Patrick I Chiyo, Laura E Grieneisen, George Wittemyer, Cynthia J Moss, Phyllis C Lee, Iain Douglas-Hamilton, Elizabeth A Archie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The under-investigated wild side ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Infectious disease transmission and contact networks in wildlife and livestock.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Patrick I ChiyoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Laura E GrieneisenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
George WittemyerDepartment of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America; Save the Elephants, Nairobi, Kenya.
Cynthia J MossAmboseli Trust for Elephants, Langata, Nairobi, Kenya.
Phyllis C LeeAmboseli Trust for Elephants, Langata, Nairobi, Kenya; Behaviour and Evolution Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Iain Douglas-HamiltonSave the Elephants, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elizabeth A ArchieDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Save the Elephants · KEUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social structure is proposed to influence the transmission of both directly and environmentally transmitted infectious agents. However in natural populations, many other factors also influence transmission, including variation in individual susceptibility and aspects of the environment that promote or inhibit exposure to infection. We used a population genetic approach to investigate the effects of social structure, environment, and host traits on the transmission of Escherichia coli infecting two populations of wild elephants: one in Amboseli National Park and another in Samburu National Reserve, Kenya. If E. coli transmission is strongly influenced by elephant social structure, E. coli infecting elephants from the same social group should be genetically more similar than E. coli sampled from members of different social groups. However, we found no support for this prediction. Instead, E. coli was panmictic across social groups, and transmission patterns were largely dominated by habitat and host traits. For instance, habitat overlap between elephant social groups predicted E. coli genetic similarity, but only in the relatively drier habitat of Samburu, and not in Amboseli, where the habitat contains large, permanent swamps. In terms of host traits, adult males were infected with more diverse haplotypes, and males were slightly more likely to harbor strains with higher pathogenic potential, as compared to adult females. In addition, elephants from similar birth cohorts were infected with genetically more similar E. coli than elephants more disparate in age. This age-structured transmission may be driven by temporal shifts in genetic structure of E. coli in the environment and the effects of age on bacterial colonization. Together, our results support the idea that, in elephants, social structure often will not exhibit strong effects on the transmission of generalist, fecal-oral transmitted bacteria. We discuss our results in the context of social, environmental, and host-related factors that influence transmission patterns.

Indexed as

EcosystemHierarchy, SocialHost SpecificityAnimalsAnimals, WildDNA, BacterialElephantsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleGene FlowGenetic VariationHaplotypesKenyaMaleDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24705319
PMCPMC3976290
OpenAlexW2064036475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.