Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24705246›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Parallel clustering algorithm for large-scale biological data sets.

Minchao Wang, Wu Zhang, Wang Ding, Dongbo Dai, Huiran Zhang, Hao Xie, Luonan Chen, Yike Guo, Jiang Xie

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Applications of Community Detection Algorithms to Large Biological Datasets.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Minchao WangSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China.
Wu ZhangSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China; High Performance Computing Center, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China.
Wang DingSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China.
Dongbo DaiSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China.
Huiran ZhangSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China.
Hao XieCollege of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, P.R.China.
Luonan ChenSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China; Key Laboratory of Systems Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, P.R.China.
Yike GuoSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China; Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jiang XieSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, P.R.China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundsRecent explosion of biological data brings a great challenge for the traditional clustering algorithms. With increasing scale of data sets, much larger memory and longer runtime are required for the cluster identification problems. The affinity propagation algorithm outperforms many other classical clustering algorithms and is widely applied into the biological researches. However, the time and space complexity become a great bottleneck when handling the large-scale data sets. Moreover, the similarity matrix, whose constructing procedure takes long runtime, is required before running the affinity propagation algorithm, since the algorithm clusters data sets based on the similarities between data pairs.

methodsTwo types of parallel architectures are proposed in this paper to accelerate the similarity matrix constructing procedure and the affinity propagation algorithm. The memory-shared architecture is used to construct the similarity matrix, and the distributed system is taken for the affinity propagation algorithm, because of its large memory size and great computing capacity. An appropriate way of data partition and reduction is designed in our method, in order to minimize the global communication cost among processes.

resultA speedup of 100 is gained with 128 cores. The runtime is reduced from serval hours to a few seconds, which indicates that parallel algorithm is capable of handling large-scale data sets effectively. The parallel affinity propagation also achieves a good performance when clustering large-scale gene data (microarray) and detecting families in large protein superfamilies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDatasets as TopicGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMicroarray AnalysisMultigene FamilyProteinsProteomicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24705246
PMCPMC3976248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.