Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24704912›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Interobserver reproducibility of diffusion-weighted MRI in monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

Robert M Kwee, Alexander K Dik, Meindert N Sosef, Ralph C M Berendsen, Sander Sassen, Guido Lammering, Ruud Clarijs, Liekele E Oostenbrug, Rachel L G M Blom, Roy F A Vliegen

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. New frontiers in esophageal radiology.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Volumetric assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient predicts outcome following chemoradiation for cervical cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. DCE-MRI-Derived Volume Transfer Constant (KTechnology in cancer research & treatment · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert M KweeDepartment of Radiology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alexander K DikDepartment of Radiology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Meindert N SosefDepartment of Surgery, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Surgical Collaborative Network Limburg, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Ralph C M BerendsenDepartment of Medical Physics, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Sander SassenDepartment of Radiology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Guido LammeringDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert-Janker-Clinic, Bonn, Germany.
Ruud ClarijsDepartment of Pathology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Liekele E OostenbrugDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Rachel L G M BlomDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roy F A VliegenDepartment of Radiology, Atrium Medical Center Parkstad, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Atrium Medisch Centrum Parkstad · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLTransnational University Limburg · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in assessing tumor response early in the course of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with operable esophageal cancer.

methodsEleven male patients (mean age 54.8 years) with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer underwent DW-MRI before and 10 days after start of chemoradiotherapy. Reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements by manual (freehand) and semi-automated volumetric methods was assessed.

resultsInterobserver reproducibility for the assessment of mean tumor ADC by the manual measurement method was good, with an ICC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.85; P = 0.001). Interobserver reproducibility for the assessment of mean tumor ADC by the semi-automated volumetric measurement method was very good, with an ICC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.98; P<0.001).

conclusionSemi-automated volumetric ADC measurements have higher reproducibility than manual ADC measurements in assessing tumor response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicNeoadjuvant TherapyObserver VariationPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24704912
PMCPMC3976260
OpenAlexW2025338870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.