ArticleNeuroImage2014
Testing for association with multiple traits in generalized estimation equations, with application to neuroimaging data.
Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative study of statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in spatial transcriptomics.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A comparative study of statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes for extremely unbalanced case-control association studies using multi-layer network.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A copula-based set-variant association test for bivariate continuous, binary or mixed phenotypes.The international journal of biostatistics · 2023Article
- Deep causal feature extraction and inference with neuroimaging genetic data.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Deep Learning-Based Feature Extraction with MRI Data in Neuroimaging Genetics for Alzheimer's Disease.Genes · 2023Article
- A generalized robust allele-based genetic association test.Biometrics · 2022Article
- Decoding Genetic Markers of Multiple Phenotypic Layers Through Biologically Constrained Genome-To-Phenome Bayesian Sparse Regression.Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2022Article
- A computationally efficient clustering linear combination approach to jointly analyze multiple phenotypes for GWAS.PloS one · 2022Article
- Associating Multivariate Traits with Genetic Variants Using Collapsing and Kernel Methods with Pedigree- or Population-Based Studies.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- Multivariate Analysis and Modelling of multiple Brain endOphenotypes: Let's MAMBO!Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- A Novel Approach Integrating Hierarchical Clustering and Weighted Combination for Association Study of Multiple Phenotypes and a Genetic Variant.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- L2RM: Low-rank Linear Regression Models for High-dimensional Matrix Responses.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020Article
- Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes using a clustering linear combination method based on hierarchical clustering.Genetic epidemiology · 2020Article
- Brain Imaging Genomics: Integrated Analysis and Machine Learning.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2020Article
- A Powerful Method To Test Associations Between Ordinal Traits and Genotypes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- A clustering linear combination approach to jointly analyze multiple phenotypes for GWAS.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- A review of kernel methods for genetic association studies.Genetic epidemiology · 2019Review
- A Distance-Based Kernel Association Test Based on the Generalized Linear Mixed Model for Correlated Microbiome Studies.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is an increasing need to develop and apply powerful statistical tests to detect multiple traits-single locus associations, as arising from neuroimaging genetics and other studies. For example, in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), in addition to genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), thousands of neuroimaging and neuropsychological phenotypes as intermediate phenotypes for Alzheimer's disease, have been collected. Although some classic methods like MANOVA and newly proposed methods may be applied, they have their own limitations. For example, MANOVA cannot be applied to binary and other discrete traits. In addition, the relationships among these methods are not well understood. Importantly, since these tests are not data adaptive, depending on the unknown association patterns among multiple traits and between multiple traits and a locus, these tests may or may not be powerful. In this paper we propose a class of data-adaptive weights and the corresponding weighted tests in the general framework of generalized estimation equations (GEE). A highly adaptive test is proposed to select the most powerful one from this class of the weighted tests so that it can maintain high power across a wide range of situations. Our proposed tests are applicable to various types of traits with or without covariates. Importantly, we also analytically show relationships among some existing and our proposed tests, indicating that many existing tests are special cases of our proposed tests. Extensive simulation studies were conducted to compare and contrast the power properties of various existing and our new methods. Finally, we applied the methods to an ADNI dataset to illustrate the performance of the methods. We conclude with the recommendation for the use of the GEE-based Score test and our proposed adaptive test for their high and complementary performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.