Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24704269›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2014

Testing for association with multiple traits in generalized estimation equations, with application to neuroimaging data.

Yiwei Zhang, Zhiyuan Xu, Xiaotong Shen, Wei Pan, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multivariate Analysis and Modelling of multiple Brain endOphenotypes: Let's MAMBO!Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. L2RM: Low-rank Linear Regression Models for High-dimensional Matrix Responses.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Brain Imaging Genomics: Integrated Analysis and Machine Learning.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiwei ZhangDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Zhiyuan XuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Xiaotong ShenSchool of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Wei PanDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: weip@biostat.umn.edu.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (NCRAD)U24AG021886 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI TATIANA M. FOROUD · 2002 to 2026
$119.8M
RECRUITMENT COREU19AG010483 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FELDMAN, HOWARD · 2013 to 2020
$80.6M
Neuropathology CoreP30AG013846 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KOWALL, NEIL W. · 1996 to 2020
$29.1M
UC Davis Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG010129 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DECARLI, CHARLES · 1991 to 2020
$28.3M
TR&D3: Intrinsic Surface MappingP41EB015922 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VAN HORN, JOHN DARRELL · 2012 to 2022
$14.1M
Association analysis of rare variants with sequencing dataR01HL116720 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, WEI, PENG · 2013 to 2020
$3.3M
Powerful Inference and Prediction for Genetic AssociationR01HL105397 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2011 to 2018
$2.9M
New Machine Learning Tools for Biomedical DataR01GM081535 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI, SHEN, XIAOTONG TOM · 2007 to 2014
$2.2M
Statistical Methods for Genomic and Proteomic DataR01HL065462 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI PAN, WEI · 2002 to 2012
$1.5M
The University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science InstituteTL1TR000096 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENNETT, NANCY M, KIEBURTZ, KARL D. · 2012 to 2015
$930k
Statistical Methods for Genomic DataR01GM113250 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2014 to 2017
$702k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL065462NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105397NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL105397NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL116720NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL116720NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL65462NIA NIH HHS K01 AG030514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010129NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013846NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U19 AG010483NIA NIH HHS U24 AG021886NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015922NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081535NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM081535NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an increasing need to develop and apply powerful statistical tests to detect multiple traits-single locus associations, as arising from neuroimaging genetics and other studies. For example, in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), in addition to genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), thousands of neuroimaging and neuropsychological phenotypes as intermediate phenotypes for Alzheimer's disease, have been collected. Although some classic methods like MANOVA and newly proposed methods may be applied, they have their own limitations. For example, MANOVA cannot be applied to binary and other discrete traits. In addition, the relationships among these methods are not well understood. Importantly, since these tests are not data adaptive, depending on the unknown association patterns among multiple traits and between multiple traits and a locus, these tests may or may not be powerful. In this paper we propose a class of data-adaptive weights and the corresponding weighted tests in the general framework of generalized estimation equations (GEE). A highly adaptive test is proposed to select the most powerful one from this class of the weighted tests so that it can maintain high power across a wide range of situations. Our proposed tests are applicable to various types of traits with or without covariates. Importantly, we also analytically show relationships among some existing and our proposed tests, indicating that many existing tests are special cases of our proposed tests. Extensive simulation studies were conducted to compare and contrast the power properties of various existing and our new methods. Finally, we applied the methods to an ADNI dataset to illustrate the performance of the methods. We conclude with the recommendation for the use of the GEE-based Score test and our proposed adaptive test for their high and complementary performance.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseBrainBrain MappingGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNerve NetNeuroimagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityaSPU testGEEGWASNeuroimaging geneticsScore testStatistical powerSum of powered score (SPU) test

Identifiers

PMID24704269
PMCPMC4043944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.