Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24703531›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2014

Intermittent chemotherapy plus either intermittent or continuous cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (COIN-B): a randomised phase 2 trial.

Harpreet Wasan, Angela M Meade, Richard Adams, Richard Wilson, Cheryl Pugh, David Fisher, Benjamin Sydes, Ayman Madi, Bruce Sizer, Charles Lowdell and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02942706 (Biomarker-Panel Guided Maintenance Treatment With Cetuximab Monotherapy Versus Continuation After First Line Induction Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02942706 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Biomarker-Panel Guided Maintenance Treatment With Cetuximab Monotherapy Versus Continuation After First Line Induction Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) : a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsCetuximab, mFOLFOX6, FOLFIRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Intermittent or Continuous Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan for First-Line Treatment ofJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  8. Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Versus Cetuximab as Maintenance Therapy in First-Line Therapy forJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy inJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Harpreet WasanImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Angela M MeadeMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK. Electronic address: a.meade@ucl.ac.uk.
Richard AdamsCardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Richard WilsonCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Cheryl PughMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
David FisherMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Benjamin SydesMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Ayman MadiMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Bruce SizerEssex County Hospital, Colchester, UK.
Charles LowdellImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Gary MiddletonUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rachel ButlerUniversity Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Richard KaplanMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
Tim MaughanCancer Research UK-MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
COIN-B investigators

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15954Medical Research Council MC_U122861325Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced colorectal cancer is treated with a combination of cytotoxic drugs and targeted treatments. However, how best to minimise the time spent taking cytotoxic drugs and whether molecular selection can refine this further is unknown. The primary aim of this study was to establish how cetuximab might be safely and effectively added to intermittent chemotherapy.

methodsCOIN-B was an open-label, multicentre, randomised, exploratory phase 2 trial done at 30 hospitals in the UK and one in Cyprus. We enrolled patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had received no previous chemotherapy for metastases. Randomisation was done centrally (by telephone) by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit using minimisation with a random element. Treatment allocation was not masked. Patients were assigned (1:1) to intermittent chemotherapy plus intermittent cetuximab or to intermittent chemotherapy plus continuous cetuximab. Chemotherapy was FOLFOX (folinic acid and oxaliplatin followed by bolus and infused fluorouracil). Patients in both groups received FOLFOX and weekly cetuximab for 12 weeks, then either had a planned interruption (those taking intermittent cetuximab) or planned maintenance by continuing on weekly cetuximab (continuous cetuximab). On RECIST progression, FOLFOX plus cetuximab or FOLFOX was recommenced for 12 weeks followed by further interruption or maintenance cetuximab, respectively. The primary outcome was failure-free survival at 10 months. The primary analysis population consisted of patients who completed 12 weeks of treatment without progression, death, or leaving the trial. We tested BRAF and NRAS status retrospectively. The trial was registered, ISRCTN38375681.

findingsWe registered 401 patients, 226 of whom were enrolled. Results for 169 with KRAS wild-type are reported here, 78 (46%) assigned to intermittent cetuximab and 91 (54%) to continuous cetuximab. 64 patients assigned to intermittent cetuximab and 66 of those assigned to continuous cetuximab were included in the primary analysis. 10-month failure-free survival was 50% (lower bound of 95% CI 39) in the intermittent group versus 52% (lower bound of 95% CI 41) in the continuous group; median failure-free survival was 12.2 months (95% CI 8.8-15.6) and 14.3 months (10.7-20.4), respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were skin rash (21 [27%] of 77 patients vs 20 [22%] of 92 patients), neutropenia (22 [29%] vs 30 [33%]), diarrhoea (14 [18%] vs 23 [25%]), and lethargy (20 [26%] vs 19 [21%]).

interpretationCetuximab was safely incorporated in two first-line intermittent chemotherapy strategies. Maintenance of biological monotherapy, with less cytotoxic chemotherapy within the first 6 months, in molecularly selected patients is promising and should be validated in phase 3 trials.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCetuximabFluorouracilKRAS protein, humanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24703531
PMCPMC4012566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.