Trial reportInternational journal of cardiology2014
Beta-blockers in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: class, dosage, and outcomes.
Trial report in International journal of cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is Carvedilol Effective in Preventing and Modulating Concentric Cardiac Remodelling? A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Association between the beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, all-cause mortality and length of hospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Association is not causation: treatment effects cannot be estimated from observational data in heart failure.European heart journal · 2018Pooled it
- Beta-blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Heart Failure in Older Patients: An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Accelerated atrial pacing reduces left-heart filling pressure: a combined clinical-computational study.European heart journal · 2024Article
- Drug Therapy for Acute and Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction with Hypertension: A State-of-the-Art Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Review
- How to Manage Beta-Blockade in Older Heart Failure Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Treatment of Heart Failure With Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: A Summary of Current Evidence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Digoxin Initiation and Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.The American journal of medicine · 2020Article
- Impact of β-Blockers on Heart Rate and Oxygen Uptake During Exercise and Recovery in Older Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2020Article
- Article
- The progress and controversial of the use of beta blockers in patients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2020Review
- Heart Failure With Mid-range Ejection Fraction.Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Improved outcome with standardized plan for clinical management of acute decompensated chronic heart failure.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2019Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in the Very Elderly Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure: Importance of Pharmacologic Guideline Adherence.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Pharmacological heart rate lowering in patients with a preserved ejection fraction-review of a failing concept.Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
- Heart Rate and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe examined the clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers considered evidenced-based to heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their recommended target doses in older adults with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
methodsIn OPTIMIZE-HF (2003-2004) linked to Medicare (2003-2008), of the 10,570 older (age ≥ 65 years, mean, 81 years) adults with HFpEF (EF ≥ 40%, mean 55%), 8373 had no contraindications to beta-blocker therapy. After excluding 4614 patients receiving pre-admission beta-blockers, the remaining 3759 patients were potentially eligible for new discharge prescriptions for beta-blockers and 1454 received them. We assembled a propensity-matched cohort of 1099 pairs of patients receiving beta-blockers and no beta-blockers, balanced on 115 baseline characteristics. Evidence-based beta-blockers for HFrEF, namely, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, and bisoprolol and their respective guideline-recommended target doses were 50, 200, and 10mg/day.
resultsDuring 6 years of follow-up, new discharge prescriptions for beta-blockers had no association with the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.94-1.13; p=0.569). This association did not vary by beta-blocker evidence class or daily dose. Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.90-1.10; p=0.897) and 1.17 (95% CI, 1.03-1.34; p=0.014), respectively. The latter association lost significance when higher EF cutoffs of ≥45%, ≥50% and ≥55% were used.
conclusionsInitiation of therapy with beta-blockers considered evidence-based for HFrEF and in target doses recommended for HFrEF had no association with the composite or individual endpoints of all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization in HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.