Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24702725›Full record

ArticleRadiology2014

Identification of intrinsic imaging phenotypes for breast cancer tumors: preliminary associations with gene expression profiles.

Ahmed Bilal Ashraf, Dania Daye, Sara Gavenonis, Carolyn Mies, Michael Feldman, Mark Rosen, Despina Kontos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The impact of radiogenomics on breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Radiogenomics in brain, breast, and lung cancer: opportunities and challenges.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed Bilal AshrafFrom the Department of Radiology (A.B.A., D.D., S.G., M.R., D.K.) and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (C.M., M.F.), University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3600 Market St, Suite 360, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Dania Daye
Sara Gavenonis
Carolyn Mies
Michael Feldman
Mark Rosen
Despina Kontos

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDUL1RR024134 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2006 to 2011
$70.4M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2012 to 2015
$38.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000003NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present a method for identifying intrinsic imaging phenotypes in breast cancer tumors and to investigate their association with prognostic gene expression profiles. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe authors retrospectively analyzed dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) images of the breast in 56 women (mean age, 55.6 years; age range, 37-74 years) diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer between 2005 and 2010. The study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Primary tumors were assayed with a validated gene expression assay that provides a score for the likelihood of recurrence. A multiparametric imaging phenotype vector was extracted for each tumor by using quantitative morphologic, kinetic, and spatial heterogeneity features. Multivariate linear regression was performed to test associations between DCE MR imaging features and recurrence likelihood. To identify intrinsic imaging phenotypes, hierarchical clustering was performed on the extracted feature vectors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to classify tumors at high versus low or medium risk of recurrence. To determine the additional value of intrinsic phenotypes, the phenotype category was tested as an additional variable. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) were used to assess classification performance.

resultsThere was a moderate correlation (r = 0.71, R(2) = 0.50, P < .001) between DCE MR imaging features and the recurrence score. DCE MR imaging features were predictive of recurrence risk as determined by the surrogate assay, with an Az of 0.77 (P < .01). Four dominant imaging phenotypes were detected, with two including only low- and medium-risk tumors. When the phenotype category was used as an additional variable, the Az increased to 0.82 (P < .01).

conclusionIntrinsic imaging phenotypes exist for breast cancer tumors and correlate with recurrence likelihood as determined with gene expression profiling. These imaging biomarkers could ultimately help guide treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleGadolinium DTPAHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhenotypeContrast MediagadodiamideGadolinium DTPA

Identifiers

PMID24702725
PMCPMC4564060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.