ArticleRadiology2014
Identification of intrinsic imaging phenotypes for breast cancer tumors: preliminary associations with gene expression profiles.
Article in Radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Integrated imaging and molecular analysis to decipher tumor microenvironment in the era of immunotherapy.Seminars in cancer biology · 2022Pooled it
- Is radiomic MRI a feasible alternative to OncotypeDX® recurrence score testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BJS open · 2021Pooled it
- A Radio-genomics Approach for Identifying High Risk Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancers on DCE-MRI: Preliminary Results in Predicting OncotypeDX Risk Scores.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- MRI Radiomics Signatures of 21-Gene Recurrence Score for Predicting Survival in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Psychological Well-Being in Breast Cancer: A Literature Review of the Impact of Precision Oncology and Radiogenomics.Cureus · 2025Review
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Advances in DCE-MRI Radiomics for Non-Invasive Prediction of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Research Progress and Clinical Translation.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Review
- From Images to Genes: Radiogenomics Based on Artificial Intelligence to Achieve Non-Invasive Precision Medicine in Cancer Patients.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- The impact of radiogenomics on breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Radiologic imaging biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer: a literature review about the role of artificial intelligence and the way forward.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Radiogenomics: a key component of precision cancer medicine.British journal of cancer · 2023Review
- Comparison of CT- and MRI-Based Quantification of Tumor Heterogeneity and Vascularity for Correlations with Prognostic Biomarkers and Survival Outcomes: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Four-Dimensional Machine Learning Radiomics for the Pretreatment Assessment of Breast Cancer Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Article
- ImaGene: a web-based software platform for tumor radiogenomic evaluation and reporting.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer imaging: risk stratification, lesion detection and classification, treatment planning and prognosis-a narrative review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2022Review
- Applying artificial intelligence technology to assist with breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Mammography-based radiomics for predicting the risk of breast cancer recurrence: a multicenter study.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?European journal of radiology · 2021Review
- Radiogenomics in brain, breast, and lung cancer: opportunities and challenges.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Review
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI features correlate with invasive breast cancer angiogenesis.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo present a method for identifying intrinsic imaging phenotypes in breast cancer tumors and to investigate their association with prognostic gene expression profiles. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe authors retrospectively analyzed dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) images of the breast in 56 women (mean age, 55.6 years; age range, 37-74 years) diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer between 2005 and 2010. The study was approved by the institutional review board and compliant with HIPAA. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Primary tumors were assayed with a validated gene expression assay that provides a score for the likelihood of recurrence. A multiparametric imaging phenotype vector was extracted for each tumor by using quantitative morphologic, kinetic, and spatial heterogeneity features. Multivariate linear regression was performed to test associations between DCE MR imaging features and recurrence likelihood. To identify intrinsic imaging phenotypes, hierarchical clustering was performed on the extracted feature vectors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to classify tumors at high versus low or medium risk of recurrence. To determine the additional value of intrinsic phenotypes, the phenotype category was tested as an additional variable. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) were used to assess classification performance.
resultsThere was a moderate correlation (r = 0.71, R(2) = 0.50, P < .001) between DCE MR imaging features and the recurrence score. DCE MR imaging features were predictive of recurrence risk as determined by the surrogate assay, with an Az of 0.77 (P < .01). Four dominant imaging phenotypes were detected, with two including only low- and medium-risk tumors. When the phenotype category was used as an additional variable, the Az increased to 0.82 (P < .01).
conclusionIntrinsic imaging phenotypes exist for breast cancer tumors and correlate with recurrence likelihood as determined with gene expression profiling. These imaging biomarkers could ultimately help guide treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.