Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24702684›Full record

ReviewExpert review of clinical pharmacology2014

Big data: the next frontier for innovation in therapeutics and healthcare.

Naiem T Issa, Stephen W Byers, Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Transforming Scientific Inquiry: Tapping Into Digital Data by Building a Culture of Transparency and Consent.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2016
    Article
  17. A crowdsourcing workflow for extracting chemical-induced disease relations from free text.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  18. Conceptualizing type 2 diabetes and its management.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naiem T IssaDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC USA.
Stephen W Byers
Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1TR000101 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2015
$19.3M
Cadherin11 in cancer & rheumatoid arthritis: Common target, common therapies? (5)R01CA170653 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BYERS, STEPHEN W · 2012 to 2015
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000101NCI NIH HHS CA170653NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS P30 CA51008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in genomics and personalized medicine not only effect healthcare delivery from patient and provider standpoints, but also reshape biomedical discovery. We are in the era of the '-omics', wherein an individual's genome, transcriptome, proteome and metabolome can be scrutinized to the finest resolution to paint a personalized biochemical fingerprint that enables tailored treatments, prognoses, risk factors, etc. Digitization of this information parlays into 'big data' informatics-driven evidence-based medical practice. While individualized patient management is a key beneficiary of next-generation medical informatics, this data also harbors a wealth of novel therapeutic discoveries waiting to be uncovered. 'Big data' informatics allows for networks-driven systems pharmacodynamics whereby drug information can be coupled to cellular- and organ-level physiology for determining whole-body outcomes. Patient '-omics' data can be integrated for ontology-based data-mining for the discovery of new biological associations and drug targets. Here we highlight the potential of 'big data' informatics for clinical pharmacology.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDrug DiscoveryGenomicsHumansMedical InformaticsPrecision MedicineProteomics

Identifiers

PMID24702684
PMCPMC4448933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.