Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24701377›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2014

Local CTLA4 blockade effectively restrains experimental pancreatic adenocarcinoma growth in vivo.

Linda C Sandin, Fredrik Eriksson, Peter Ellmark, Angelica Si Loskog, Thomas H Tötterman, Sara M Mangsbo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Immune Checkpoint Therapy: Tumor Draining Lymph Nodes in the Spotlights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Advances in engineering local drug delivery systems for cancer immunotherapy.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda C SandinDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology; Clinical Immunology; Uppsala University; Uppsala, Sweden.
Fredrik ErikssonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology; Clinical Immunology; Uppsala University; Uppsala, Sweden.
Peter EllmarkAlligator Bioscience AB; Lund, Sweden ; Department of Immunotechnology; Lund University; Lund, Sweden.
Angelica Si LoskogDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology; Clinical Immunology; Uppsala University; Uppsala, Sweden.
Thomas H TöttermanDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology; Clinical Immunology; Uppsala University; Uppsala, Sweden.
Sara M MangsboDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology; Clinical Immunology; Uppsala University; Uppsala, Sweden.
Pediatrics and Genetics · USUppsala University · SELund University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-mediated blockade of CTLA4 has been shown to be effective in treating a select group of patients with late-stage melanoma. The precise mechanism underlying the clinical activity of CTLA4 immunotherapy is poorly understood, although recent experimental findings indicate that antibody-mediated depletion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment plays a key role in efficacious antitumor responses. In the current study, we used an experimental model of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to compare the antitumor efficacy of peritumoral low-dose anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) administration to that of a commonly utilized systemic high-dose anti-CTLA4 regimen. We selected pancreatic adenocarcinoma as it presents a particular challenge to clinicians due to its aggressive behavior, metastatic spread and limited treatment options. Furthermore, Fc gamma receptor (FcγR)-dense myeloid cells commonly infiltrate pancreatic tumors, such that these tumor types exhibit increased susceptibility to CTLA4 antibody-targeted Treg depletion via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Locally administered anti-CTLA4 mAb effectively reduced tumor growth at a low dose and no additional anti-tumor effects were apparent when increasing the dose or number of injections. No significant difference in overall survival was seen when comparing locally administered low-dose with standard systemic high-dose CTLA4 blockade therapy, and both delivery routes led to increased tumor-infiltrating effector T cells and reduced Treg cells. As opposed to low-dose peritumoral treatment, high-dose systemic therapy stimulated the accumulation of Tregs in secondary lymphoid organs, an effect that could potentially counteract the antitumor immunotherapeutic benefit of CTLA4 blockade. Our study confirms previous findings that local administration of low-dose anti-CTLA4 antibody generates sustained antitumor effects and provides rationale to devise ultrasound-guided intratumoral anti-CTLA4 antibody injection regimens to treat patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and other types of solid tumors. In support, clinical relevancy could include reduced immune-related adverse events by limiting systemic antibody spread to immune cell-dense organs.

Indexed as

anti-CTLA4checkpoint blockadeimmunotherapylocal therapypancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID24701377
PMCPMC3962508
OpenAlexW2057377546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.