Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24701217›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2014

Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Natasa Mujovic, Nebojsa Mujovic, Dragan Subotic, Milan Marinkovic, Andjela Milovanovic, Jelena Stojsic, Vladimir Zugic, Mirko Grajic, Dejan Nikolic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Timeliness of Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natasa MujovicClinic for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia ; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nebojsa MujovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia ; Clinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dragan SuboticFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia ; Clinic for Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milan MarinkovicClinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Andjela MilovanovicClinic for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia ; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena StojsicDepartment for Respiratory Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vladimir ZugicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia ; Clinic for Pulmonary Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Mirko GrajicClinic for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia ; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dejan NikolicPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, University Children's Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to assess the effects of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) on preoperative clinical status changes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and net effects of PPR and cancer resection on residual pulmonary function and functional capacity. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis prospective single group study included 83 COPD patients (62 ±8 years, 85% males, FEV1 = 1844 ±618 ml, Tiffeneau index = 54 ±9%) with NSCLC, on 2-4-week PPR, before resection. Pulmonary function, and functional and symptom status were evaluated by spirometry, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and Borg scale, on admission, after PPR and after surgery.

resultsFollowing PPR significant improvement was registered in the majority of spirometry parameters (FEV1 by 374 ml, p < 0.001; VLC by 407 ml, p < 0.001; FEF50 by 3%, p = 0.003), 6MWD (for 56 m, p < 0.001) and dyspnoeal symptoms (by 1.0 Borg unit, p < 0.001). A positive correlation was identified between preoperative increments of FEV1 and 6MWD (r s = 0.503, p = 0.001). Negative correlations were found between basal FEV1 and its percentage increment (r s = -0.479, p = 0.001) and between basal 6MWD and its percentage change (r s = -0.603, p < 0.001) during PPR. Compared to basal values, after resection a significant reduction of most spirometry parameters and 6MWD were recorded, while Tiffeneau index, FEF25 and dyspnoea severity remained stable (p = NS).

conclusionsPreoperative pulmonary rehabilitation significantly enhances clinical status of COPD patients before NSCLC resection. Preoperative increase of exercise tolerance was the result of pulmonary function improvement during PPR. The beneficial effects of PPR were most emphasized in patients with initially the worst pulmonary function and the weakest functional capacity.

Indexed as

lung cancerlung cancer surgerylung resectionpreoperative physiotherapypulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID24701217
PMCPMC3953962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.