Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24701103›Full record

ArticleJournal of laboratory physicians2013

Fluoroquinolone Therapy in Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Where Do We Stand?

Neeta D Gade, Mohiuddin S Qazi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of laboratory physicians, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular detection ofIn silico pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Antibiotics forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The prevalence ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Bio-evaluation of fluoro and trifluoromethyl-substituted salicylanilides against multidrug-resistantMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2021
    Article
  18. Acquisition Risk Factors of the SCCAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neeta D GadeDepartment of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Mohiuddin S QaziDepartment of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe study aimed to evaluate the utility of various commonly used fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus isolates. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 250 isolates of S. aureus were studied from different clinical specimens like blood, pus, wound swabs, sputum, ear swabs, and body fluids between November 2009 and December 2011. All the isolates were tested for their susceptibility to fluoroquinolones and other antimicrobial agents by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method using criteria of standard zone of inhibition. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) detection was done by cefoxitin disk diffusion method. The MRSA isolates were tested for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin by E-test strips. All the MRSA strains were sent to National Staphylococcal Phage-typing Centre, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi for phage typing.

resultsA total of 107 strains of S. aureus (42.8%) were detected as MRSA. Multidrug resistance was observed among the MRSA strains more commonly than among the MSSA stains. Among the fluoroquinolones, maximum resistance in MRSA was seen to ciprofloxacin (92.5%), followed by ofloxacin (80.4%). None of the S. aureus isolates showed resistance to vancomycin and linezolid. The MICs of vancomycin for the MRSA tested ranged from 0.5 to 2 μg/ml. Phage typing pattern of 107 MRSA isolates revealed that 37 (34.6%) MRSA isolates were nontypeable and 70 (65.4%) were typeable.

conclusionCiprofloxacin can no longer be used in empirical therapy against MRSA infections. Use of other members of fluoroquinolone should be limited only to those strains that show laboratory confirmation of their susceptibility. Vancomycin remains the drug of choice to treat MRSA infections.

Indexed as

Fluoroquinolonesmethicillin-resistant S. aureusphage typingStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID24701103
PMCPMC3968619
OpenAlexW1966571296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.