Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24700803›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the National Cancer Institute2014

Risk prediction for late-stage ovarian cancer by meta-analysis of 1525 patient samples.

Markus Riester, Wei Wei, Levi Waldron, Aedin C Culhane, Lorenzo Trippa, Esther Oliva, Sung-Hoon Kim, Franziska Michor, Curtis Huttenhower, Giovanni Parmigiani and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Impact of Stroma Admixture on Molecular Subtypes and Prognostic Gene Signatures in Serous Ovarian Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Machine learning for microbiologists.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Heterogeneity and treatment landscape of ovarian carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Markus RiesterAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Wei WeiAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Levi WaldronAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Aedin C CulhaneAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Lorenzo TrippaAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Esther OlivaAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Sung-Hoon KimAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Franziska MichorAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Curtis HuttenhowerAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Giovanni ParmigianiAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK).
Michael J BirrerAffiliations of authors: Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (MR, ACC, LT, FM, CH, GP); Center for Cancer Research (WW, S-hK, MB) and Department of Pathology (EO), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; City University of New York School of Public Health, Hunter College, New York, NY (LW); Sung-hoon Kim, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (S-HK). mbirrer@partners.org.

Funding

VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI JENNIFER W MACK · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
Genomic Stratification of Ovarian Cancer PatientsRC4CA156551 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BIRRER, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2010
$3.7M
Novel Biomarkers in Ovarian CancerR01CA142832 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BIRRER, MICHAEL · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 1RC4CA156551-01NCI NIH HHS 5P30 CA006516-46NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA142832NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142832NCI NIH HHS RC4 CA156551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer causes more than 15000 deaths per year in the United States. The survival of patients is quite heterogeneous, and accurate prognostic tools would help with the clinical management of these patients.

methodsWe developed and validated two gene expression signatures, the first for predicting survival in advanced-stage, serous ovarian cancer and the second for predicting debulking status. We integrated 13 publicly available datasets totaling 1525 subjects. We trained prediction models using a meta-analysis variation on the compound covariable method, tested models by a "leave-one-dataset-out" procedure, and validated models in additional independent datasets. Selected genes from the debulking signature were validated by immunohistochemistry and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in two further independent cohorts of 179 and 78 patients, respectively. All statistical tests were two-sided.

resultsThe survival signature stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups (hazard ratio = 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.84 to 2.61) statistically significantly better than the TCGA signature (P = .04). POSTN, CXCL14, FAP, NUAK1, PTCH1, and TGFBR2 were validated by qRT-PCR (P < .05) and POSTN, CXCL14, and phosphorylated Smad2/3 were validated by immunohistochemistry (P < .001) as independent predictors of debulking status. The sum of immunohistochemistry intensities for these three proteins provided a tool that classified 92.8% of samples correctly in high- and low-risk groups for suboptimal debulking (area under the curve = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.93).

conclusionsOur survival signature provides the most accurate and validated prognostic model for early- and advanced-stage high-grade, serous ovarian cancer. The debulking signature accurately predicts the outcome of cytoreductive surgery, potentially allowing for stratification of patients for primary vs secondary cytoreduction.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOvarian NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsTranscriptomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24700803
PMCPMC4580556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.