Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24700637›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2015

Susceptibility tensor imaging of the kidney and its microstructural underpinnings.

Luke Xie, Russell Dibb, Gary P Cofer, Wei Li, Peter J Nicholls, G Allan Johnson, Chunlei Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. QSM Throughout the Body.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Asymmetric susceptibility tensor imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Mapping kidney tubule diameter ex vivo by diffusion MRI.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2021
    Article
  12. New imaging tools to measure nephron numberJournal of developmental origins of health and disease · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luke XieCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Russell Dibb
Gary P Cofer
Wei Li
Peter J Nicholls
G Allan Johnson
Chunlei Liu

Funding

INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
Small Animal Imaging Resource ProgramU24CA092656 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2007 to 2011
$2.2M
Ultra-Resolution Imaging of Brain Circuitry and its Development in Mental HealthR01MH096979 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LIU, CHUNLEI · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA092656NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096979NIMH NIH HHS R01MH096979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine whether susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) could overcome limitations of current techniques to detect tubules throughout the kidney.

methodsNormal mouse kidneys (n = 4) were imaged at 9.4T using a three-dimensional gradient multi-echo sequence (55-micron isotropic resolution). Phase images from 12 orientations were obtained to compute the susceptibility tensor. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with 12 encoding directions was compared with STI. Tractography was performed to visualize and track the course of tubules with DTI and STI. Confocal microscopy was used to identify which tubular segments of the nephron were detected by DTI and STI.

resultsDiffusion anisotropy was limited to the inner medulla of the kidney. DTI did not find a significant number of coherent tubular tracks in the outer medulla or cortex. With STI, we found strong susceptibility anisotropy and many tracks in the inner and outer medulla and in limited areas of the cortex.

conclusionSTI was able to track tubules throughout the kidney, whereas DTI was limited to the inner medulla. STI provides a novel contrast mechanism related to local tubule microstructure and may offer a powerful method to study the nephron.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsDiffusion Tensor ImagingImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIn Vitro TechniquesKidney TubulesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitydiffusion tensor imaging (DTI)gradient multi-echo (GRME)magnetic resonance imagingmouse nephron tubulequantitative susceptibility mappingsusceptibility tensor imaging (STI)tractography

Identifiers

PMID24700637
PMCPMC4183741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.