Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24700565›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2014

Diffusion-weighted MRI for staging and evaluation of response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a pilot study.

Marilyn J Siegel, Clint E Jokerst, Dhana Rajderkar, Charles F Hildebolt, Sagun Goyal, Farrokh Dehdashti, Nina Wagner Johnston, Barry A Siegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marilyn J SiegelMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Clint E Jokerst
Dhana Rajderkar
Charles F Hildebolt
Sagun Goyal
Farrokh Dehdashti
Nina Wagner Johnston
Barry A Siegel
Mallinckrodt (United States) · USWashington University in St. Louis · USSaint Louis University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI David G DeNardo · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the staging and evaluation of the treatment response in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study; all subjects gave informed consent. Twelve patients were imaged before treatment and eight of these were also imaged after two cycles of chemotherapy using both DW-MRI and PET/CT. Up to six target lesions were selected at baseline for response assessment based on International Working Group criteria (nodes > 1.5 cm in diameter; extranodal lesions > 1 cm in diameter). For pretreatment staging, visual analysis of the numbers of nodal and extranodal lesions based on PET/CT was performed. For interim response assessment after cycle 2 of chemotherapy, residual tumor sites were assessed visually and the percentage changes in target lesion size, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax ) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from pretreatment values were calculated. In 12 patients studied pretreatment, there were 46 nodal and 16 extranodal sites of lymphomatous involvement. Agreement between DW-MRI and PET/CT for overall lesion detection was 97% (60/62 tumor sites; 44/46 nodal and 16/16 extranodal lesions) and, for Ann Arbor stage, it was 100%. In the eight patients who had interim assessment, five of their 49 tumor sites remained abnormal on visual analysis of both DW-MRI and PET/CT, and there was one false positive on DW-MRI. Of their 24 target lesions, the mean pretreatment ADC value, tumor size and SUVmax were 772 µm(2) /s, 21.3 cm(2) and 16.9 g/mL, respectively. At interim assessment of the same 24 target lesions, ADC values increased by 85%, tumor size decreased by 74% and SUVmax decreased by 83% (all p < 0.01 versus baseline). DW-MRI provides results comparable with those of PET/CT for staging and early response assessment in patients with DLBCL.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPilot ProjectsPositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computedapparent diffusion coefficientdiffuse large B-cell lymphomadiffusion-weighted MRIpositron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)response to chemotherapystandardized uptake value

Identifiers

PMID24700565
PMCPMC4026031
OpenAlexW2144065509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.