ArticleNMR in biomedicine2014
Diffusion-weighted MRI for staging and evaluation of response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a pilot study.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole-Body MRI Is an Effective Imaging Modality for Hematological Malignancy Treatment Response Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for cutaneous melanoma staging: A scientific review.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and [European radiology · 2024Review
- Detection of bone marrow metastases in children and young adults with solid cancers with diffusion-weighted MRI.Skeletal radiology · 2023Article
- One-stop local and whole-body staging of children with cancer.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in lymphoma-comparison of global apparent diffusion coefficient histogram parameters for differentiation of diseased nodes of lymphoma patients from normal lymph nodes of healthy individuals.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Therapy Response Assessment of Pediatric Tumors with Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/MRI.Radiology · 2020Article
- Osteonecrosis detected by whole body magnetic resonance in patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma treated by BEACOPP.European radiology · 2017Article
- Diffusion MRI in early cancer therapeutic response assessment.NMR in biomedicine · 2017Review
- Semiautomated Workflow for Clinically Streamlined Glioma Parametric Response Mapping.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2016Article
- Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring chemotherapeutic efficacy in gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Simultaneous whole body (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of pediatric cancer: Preliminary experience and comparison with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography.World journal of radiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the staging and evaluation of the treatment response in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study; all subjects gave informed consent. Twelve patients were imaged before treatment and eight of these were also imaged after two cycles of chemotherapy using both DW-MRI and PET/CT. Up to six target lesions were selected at baseline for response assessment based on International Working Group criteria (nodes > 1.5 cm in diameter; extranodal lesions > 1 cm in diameter). For pretreatment staging, visual analysis of the numbers of nodal and extranodal lesions based on PET/CT was performed. For interim response assessment after cycle 2 of chemotherapy, residual tumor sites were assessed visually and the percentage changes in target lesion size, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax ) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from pretreatment values were calculated. In 12 patients studied pretreatment, there were 46 nodal and 16 extranodal sites of lymphomatous involvement. Agreement between DW-MRI and PET/CT for overall lesion detection was 97% (60/62 tumor sites; 44/46 nodal and 16/16 extranodal lesions) and, for Ann Arbor stage, it was 100%. In the eight patients who had interim assessment, five of their 49 tumor sites remained abnormal on visual analysis of both DW-MRI and PET/CT, and there was one false positive on DW-MRI. Of their 24 target lesions, the mean pretreatment ADC value, tumor size and SUVmax were 772 µm(2) /s, 21.3 cm(2) and 16.9 g/mL, respectively. At interim assessment of the same 24 target lesions, ADC values increased by 85%, tumor size decreased by 74% and SUVmax decreased by 83% (all p < 0.01 versus baseline). DW-MRI provides results comparable with those of PET/CT for staging and early response assessment in patients with DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.