Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24700356›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2014

Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Dimitri Sarlos, LaVonne Kots, Gloria Ryu, Gabriel Schaer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03667521 (Prospective Cross-sectional Study on the Prevalence of Stool Outlet Obstruction After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexie at the KSA), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03667521 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Cross-sectional Study on the Prevalence of Stool Outlet Obstruction After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexie at the KSA

TypeobservationalSponsorKantonsspital AarauRan2015 to 2018Enrolled55ConditionsStool Outlet ObstructionArmsnerve-sparing laparaoscopic sacrocolpopexy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It.International urogynecology journal · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitri SarlosDepartment of Gynecology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland, la.kots@ksa.ch.
LaVonne Kots
Gloria Ryu
Gabriel Schaer
Kantonsspital Aarau · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis study evaluates the long-term results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. In a prior publication, we demonstrated that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe method with excellent anatomical results and low recurrence rates after a 12-month follow-up. This study now evaluates the long-term objectives and subjective outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy after 5 years (mean).

methodsFrom 2003 to 2007, a prospective study enrolling 101 patients was conducted to evaluate laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as a treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. The long-term results were assessed postoperatively after 5 years by gynecological examinations, including the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system and quality of life assessments using validated questionnaires.

resultsA total of 68 patients received a full clinical follow-up exam between July and September 2011, and 17 patients were assessed by questionnaires only. Altogether, six anatomical recurrences in the anterior, four in the posterior, and one in the apical compartment were found during the 5 years after surgery; 83.8 % of patients had no prolapse in any compartment or stage 0 prolapse according to the International Continence Society (ICS) classification. The total reoperation rate was 3.5 %. Two mesh erosions into the bladder occurred, though no vaginal erosion occurred. The preoperative quality of life index improved from 5.6 to 9.1 (12 months) and 8.3 (60 months) postoperatively, resulting in a subjective cure rate of 95.3 %.

conclusionsLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has demonstrated excellent anatomical and functional long-term results. With the ongoing debate about the complications of vaginal mesh surgery, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy should be considered a favorable treatment option for patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Indexed as

FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapsePostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRecurrenceSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID24700356
OpenAlexW1966450872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.