ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2014
Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03667521 (Prospective Cross-sectional Study on the Prevalence of Stool Outlet Obstruction After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexie at the KSA), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Cross-sectional Study on the Prevalence of Stool Outlet Obstruction After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexie at the KSA
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh fixation: a randomized trial comparing synthetic cyanoacrylate glue to sutures.World journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Concomitant Short Total Vaginal Length and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Mesh Sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Autonomic Plexuses of the Female Sexual Organs Travel Within Pubocervical and Rectovaginal [Endopelvic] Fascia: A Rationale for 'Nerve-Aware' Vaginal Prolapse Repair.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse with an Emphasis on the Central Compartment: From Genetic Risk Factors and Biomarkers to Contemporary Sacropexy and Emerging Robotic Innovations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic Sacropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Comparison of Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- One-year outcomes of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy procedure using inverted T-mesh for treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Unilateral pectineal suspension with mesh as a rescue procedure when sacrocolpopexy is not feasible: a case series.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- From Mesh to Modern Therapies: An Updated Narrative Review on Urogenital Prolapse.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Can Alleviate Postoperative Overactive Bladder Symptoms With or Without Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Both Preoperative Symptoms.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Three-Year Outcomes of a Multicenter Study of Japanese-Style Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It.International urogynecology journal · 2024Review
- Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Sacrocolpopexy-A Surgical Challenge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Dubuisson Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension with Laparoscopic Sacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Short-Term Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Safety and medium-term outcome of redo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a matched case-control study.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Impact of sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse on voiding dysfunction and uroflowmetry parameters: a prospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Anatomical and symptomatic outcomes in patients with Le Fort colpocleisis with or without hysterectomy.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension (LLS) for the Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A New Gold Standard?Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Strengthen the sacral ligament and paravagina by equilibrium control severe pelvic organ prolapse.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis study evaluates the long-term results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. In a prior publication, we demonstrated that laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe method with excellent anatomical results and low recurrence rates after a 12-month follow-up. This study now evaluates the long-term objectives and subjective outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy after 5 years (mean).
methodsFrom 2003 to 2007, a prospective study enrolling 101 patients was conducted to evaluate laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as a treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. The long-term results were assessed postoperatively after 5 years by gynecological examinations, including the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system and quality of life assessments using validated questionnaires.
resultsA total of 68 patients received a full clinical follow-up exam between July and September 2011, and 17 patients were assessed by questionnaires only. Altogether, six anatomical recurrences in the anterior, four in the posterior, and one in the apical compartment were found during the 5 years after surgery; 83.8 % of patients had no prolapse in any compartment or stage 0 prolapse according to the International Continence Society (ICS) classification. The total reoperation rate was 3.5 %. Two mesh erosions into the bladder occurred, though no vaginal erosion occurred. The preoperative quality of life index improved from 5.6 to 9.1 (12 months) and 8.3 (60 months) postoperatively, resulting in a subjective cure rate of 95.3 %.
conclusionsLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has demonstrated excellent anatomical and functional long-term results. With the ongoing debate about the complications of vaginal mesh surgery, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy should be considered a favorable treatment option for patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.