Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24700302›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2014

Immunotherapy following regional chemotherapy treatment of advanced extremity melanoma.

Betty S Jiang, Georgia M Beasley, Paul J Speicher, Paul J Mosca, Michael A Morse, Brent Hanks, April Salama, Douglas S Tyler

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cytokines: Signalling Improved Immunotherapy?Current oncology reports · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Contemporary Approaches to In-Transit Melanoma.Journal of oncology practice · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Betty S JiangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Georgia M Beasley
Paul J Speicher
Paul J Mosca
Michael A Morse
Brent Hanks
April Salama
Douglas S Tyler
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

Translational Research in Surgical OncologyT32CA093245 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLEN, PETER J, HARPOLE, DAVID H. · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
Melanoma-mediated Dendritic Cell Tolerization and Immune EvasionK08CA191063 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HANKS, BRENT ALLEN · 2015 to 2019
$826k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA191063NCI NIH HHS T32 CA093245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFollowing regional chemotherapy (RC) for melanoma, approximately 75 % of patients will progress. The role of immunotherapy after RC has not been well established.

methodsA prospective, single-institution database of 243 patients with in-transit melanoma (1995-2013) was queried for patients who had progression of disease after RC with melphalan and subsequently received systemic immunotherapy. Fifteen patients received IL-2 only, 12 received ipilimumab only, and 6 received IL-2 followed by ipilimumab. Fisher's exact test was used to determine if there was a difference in number of complete responders after immunotherapy.

resultsWith IL-2 alone, all patients progressed. After ipilimumab alone, three patients had a complete response and nine had progressive disease. Six additional patients received IL-2 first then ipilimumab. All six progressed on IL-2 but three went on to have a complete response to ipilimumab while three progressed. The use of ipilimumab at any time in patients who progressed after RC was associated with higher rate of complete response compared to use of IL-2 alone (33 vs. 0 %; p = 0.021).

conclusionsPatients with progression after regional therapy for melanoma may benefit from immunologic therapy. In this group of patients, immune checkpoint blockade with ipilimumab has a higher complete response rate than T cell stimulation with IL-2, with no complete responders in the IL-2 only group. Furthermore, the complete response rate for ipilimumab in our cohort is higher than reported response rates in the literature for ipilimumab alone, suggesting that the effects of immunotherapy may be bolstered by previous regional treatment.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionExtremitiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterleukin-2IpilimumabMaleMelanomaMelphalanMiddle AgedAntibodies, MonoclonalInterleukin-2IpilimumabMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID24700302
PMCPMC5161099
OpenAlexW1990935194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.