ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2014
[Sonographic fracture diagnosis in children].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound for Distal Forearm Fracture: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Number of positive radiographic findings in pediatric trauma patients.Emergency radiology · 2017Article
- [Sonographic fracture diagnostics].Der Radiologe · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X-rays are the standard imaging procedure for the diagnosis of pediatric long bone fractures. Recent studies show that ultrasound (US) imaging is also qualified to diagnose pediatric long bones fractures. Thus, the diagnosis and decision-making for the treatment of metaphyseal forearm fractures in children can be performed by solely using US. The sonographic fat pad sign has been proven to be a useful primary screening tool for pediatric elbow injuries. If there is a negative fat pad sign, a fracture is unlikely and taking additional radiographs is dispensable at this time. If there is a positive fat pad sign, a fracture is likely and radiographs should be taken. US is also useful to exclude subcapital humeral fractures and to estimate fracture displacement. If a fracture of the subcapital humerus is present, additional radiographs are necessary to avoid overlooking of pathologic fractures. For reliable sonographic fracture diagnosis in childhood, a detailed history und exact clinical examination are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.