Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24700029›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2014

ATR checkpoint kinase and CRL1βTRCP collaborate to degrade ASF1a and thus repress genes overlapping with clusters of stalled replication forks.

Jun-Sub Im, Mignon Keaton, Kyung Yong Lee, Pankaj Kumar, Jonghoon Park, Anindya Dutta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetics in prostate cancer treatment.Journal of translational genetics and genomics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. BMI1-UBR5 axis regulates transcriptional repression at damaged chromatin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cell cycle-dependent changes in H3K56ac in human cells.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2015
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun-Sub ImDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
Mignon Keaton
Kyung Yong Lee
Pankaj Kumar
Jonghoon Park
Anindya Dutta
University of Virginia · US

Funding

The role of MCM8-9 in genomic instability of cancersR01CA060499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Anindya Dutta · 1994 to 2026
$8.6M
Effect of anti-S phase agents on human chromosomesR01CA166054 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI DUTTA, ANINDYA · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA60499NCI NIH HHS R01 CA060499NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many agents used for chemotherapy, such as doxorubicin, interfere with DNA replication, but the effect of this interference on transcription is largely unknown. Here we show that doxorubicin induces the firing of dense clusters of neoreplication origins that lead to clusters of stalled replication forks in gene-rich parts of the genome, particularly on expressed genes. Genes that overlap with these clusters of stalled forks are actively dechromatinized, unwound, and repressed by an ATR-dependent checkpoint pathway. The ATR checkpoint pathway causes a histone chaperone normally associated with the replication fork, ASF1a, to degrade through a CRL1(βTRCP)-dependent ubiquitination/proteasome pathway, leading to the localized dechromatinization and gene repression. Therefore, a globally active checkpoint pathway interacts with local clusters of stalled forks to specifically repress genes in the vicinity of the stalled forks, providing a new mechanism of action of chemotherapy drugs like doxorubicin. Finally, ASF1a-depleted cancer cells are more sensitive to doxorubicin, suggesting that the 7%-10% of prostate adenocarcinomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas reported to have homozygous deletion or significant underexpression of ASF1a should be tested for high sensitivity to doxorubicin.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorCellsDNA ReplicationDoxorubicinGene Knockdown TechniquesHeLa CellsHistonesHumansMolecular ChaperonesReplication OriginRNA Polymerase IIAntineoplastic AgentsASF1A protein, humanAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCULL-RING ligase, humanDoxorubicinHistonesMolecular ChaperonesRNA Polymerase IIUbiquitin-Protein LigasesASF1ATRCRL1βTRCPdoxorubicinS-phase checkpointstalled forkstranscription repression

Identifiers

PMID24700029
PMCPMC4003279
OpenAlexW2117797183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.